Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6531 - 6540 of 74953 for public records.

Jerome Hoepker v. City of Madison Plan Commission
to the City of Madison, so that the full range of urban services, including public sanitary sewer and public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9414 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Jerome Hoepker v. City of Madison Plan Commission
approved and recorded as required by ch. 236, STATS. Because the Hoepkers' property is within the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9414 - 2017-09-19

Frontsheet
We approve and adopt the referee's findings and conclusions and we agree that a public reprimand
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123952 - 2014-10-13

[PDF] State v. David Guzman
, which was later established to be located within 1,000 feet of a public school. On October 27, 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15350 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
to relief, or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36519 - 2009-05-18

[PDF] Wisconsin Professional Police Association v. Oneida County
the public interest and welfare is an appropriate factor under WIS. STAT. ยง 111.77(6)(c), the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2266 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. David Guzman
, which was later established to be located within 1,000 feet of a public school. On October 27, 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15351 - 2017-09-21

State v. Robert Junior Carr
discretion. McCleary, 49 Wis. 2d at 278. A strong public policy exists against interfering with the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18142 - 2005-05-16

[PDF] Frontsheet
and conclusions and we agree that a public reprimand is sufficient discipline for Attorney Creedy's misconduct
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123952 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief, the circuit court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36519 - 2014-09-15