Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 65361 - 65370 of 68776 for had.
Search results 65361 - 65370 of 68776 for had.
State v. Eric J. Yelk
these matters with [his trial counsel],” and that he had no unanswered questions about the proceedings before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11852 - 2005-03-31
these matters with [his trial counsel],” and that he had no unanswered questions about the proceedings before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11852 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eric J. Yelk
these matters with [his trial counsel],” and that he had no unanswered questions about the proceedings before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11853 - 2005-03-31
these matters with [his trial counsel],” and that he had no unanswered questions about the proceedings before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11853 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a state right-to-work law. He contends, however, that Sweeney’s holding that a state had legally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344876 - 2021-03-11
of a state right-to-work law. He contends, however, that Sweeney’s holding that a state had legally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344876 - 2021-03-11
State v. Eric J. Yelk
these matters with [his trial counsel],” and that he had no unanswered questions about the proceedings before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11850 - 2005-03-31
these matters with [his trial counsel],” and that he had no unanswered questions about the proceedings before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11850 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
serve the entire 40 years.” Hennings acknowledges, however, that he had served only seventeen years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111763 - 2017-09-21
serve the entire 40 years.” Hennings acknowledges, however, that he had served only seventeen years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111763 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert E.O.
the 7/18/96 order had not expired as of the 9/24/96 hearing date, any time computation prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13082 - 2017-09-21
the 7/18/96 order had not expired as of the 9/24/96 hearing date, any time computation prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13082 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
for this motion are: (1) the statute under which he was charged had been improperly enacted, was unconstitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30270 - 2007-09-17
for this motion are: (1) the statute under which he was charged had been improperly enacted, was unconstitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30270 - 2007-09-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) the party against whom the sanction is imposed had notice that default judgment was a possible sanction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242664 - 2019-06-25
) the party against whom the sanction is imposed had notice that default judgment was a possible sanction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242664 - 2019-06-25
State v. Albin E. Bartosz
of no contest and a fine of $86. Bartosz now contends that because the State had the opportunity to seek
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8294 - 2005-03-31
of no contest and a fine of $86. Bartosz now contends that because the State had the opportunity to seek
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8294 - 2005-03-31
Cynthia J. Hinojosa v. Joe R. Hinojosa
the evidence did not establish that Joe's expenses would have been less if he had not been cohabiting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11697 - 2005-03-31
the evidence did not establish that Joe's expenses would have been less if he had not been cohabiting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11697 - 2005-03-31