Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6541 - 6550 of 30092 for consulta de causas.
Search results 6541 - 6550 of 30092 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
Elmer W. Glaeske v. Elwyn M. Shaw
this motion as one for summary judgment, we review de novo the trial court’s action on the motion. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4595 - 2017-09-19
this motion as one for summary judgment, we review de novo the trial court’s action on the motion. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4595 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI App 132
de novo a trial court’s rulings on summary judgment and apply the governing standards “just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39283 - 2014-09-15
de novo a trial court’s rulings on summary judgment and apply the governing standards “just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39283 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
F.R. v. T.B.
discretion because it applied an incorrect legal standard, we review that issue de novo. See Kerkvliet v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13779 - 2014-09-15
discretion because it applied an incorrect legal standard, we review that issue de novo. See Kerkvliet v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13779 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 186
applying de novo review to trial court’s implicit determination that issue was moot). We are satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26216 - 2014-09-15
applying de novo review to trial court’s implicit determination that issue was moot). We are satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26216 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. These are legal questions that we review de novo; while “we consider the [trial] court’s interpretation, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913794 - 2025-02-12
. These are legal questions that we review de novo; while “we consider the [trial] court’s interpretation, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913794 - 2025-02-12
[PDF]
WI APP 19
of the trial court’s summary-judgment ruling is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91299 - 2014-09-15
of the trial court’s summary-judgment ruling is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91299 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
questions of agency authority de novo. This case also requires us to interpret several statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=459045 - 2021-12-02
questions of agency authority de novo. This case also requires us to interpret several statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=459045 - 2021-12-02
COURT OF APPEALS
, which this court reviews de novo. State v. Post, 197 Wis. 2d 279, 301, 541 N.W.2d 115 (1995). Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53874 - 2010-09-01
, which this court reviews de novo. State v. Post, 197 Wis. 2d 279, 301, 541 N.W.2d 115 (1995). Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53874 - 2010-09-01
COURT OF APPEALS
that our standard of review on this issue is de novo, because the trial court did not grant Softscape’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68025 - 2011-07-13
that our standard of review on this issue is de novo, because the trial court did not grant Softscape’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68025 - 2011-07-13
[PDF]
County of Jefferson v. Christopher D. Renz
. (continued) No. 97-3512 8 we review de novo. See State v. Pittman, 174 Wis.2d 255, 276, 496 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13338 - 2017-09-21
. (continued) No. 97-3512 8 we review de novo. See State v. Pittman, 174 Wis.2d 255, 276, 496 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13338 - 2017-09-21