Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6541 - 6550 of 19349 for transfer by affidavit.
Search results 6541 - 6550 of 19349 for transfer by affidavit.
CA Blank Order
plea. We agree. Attached to the report is appellate counsel’s affidavit outlining his conversations
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120639 - 2014-09-02
plea. We agree. Attached to the report is appellate counsel’s affidavit outlining his conversations
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120639 - 2014-09-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the receptionist that she was there to serve legal process. The assistant did not prepare an affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86754 - 2014-09-15
the receptionist that she was there to serve legal process. The assistant did not prepare an affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86754 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164946 - 2017-09-21
with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164946 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that she was there to serve legal process. The assistant did not prepare an affidavit of service and could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86754 - 2012-09-04
that she was there to serve legal process. The assistant did not prepare an affidavit of service and could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86754 - 2012-09-04
State v. Francis E. Altman
claims the warrant was invalid because it was not accompanied by a sworn “affidavit.” Altman is mistaken
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26043 - 2006-07-31
claims the warrant was invalid because it was not accompanied by a sworn “affidavit.” Altman is mistaken
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26043 - 2006-07-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
and an affidavit providing information that Amanda could use to contact Christopher P. if she so chose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32321 - 2014-09-15
and an affidavit providing information that Amanda could use to contact Christopher P. if she so chose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32321 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
not consider whether Matthew Kosek’s affidavit, that he did not receive any report from the Hanauskas’ engineer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48356 - 2010-03-30
not consider whether Matthew Kosek’s affidavit, that he did not receive any report from the Hanauskas’ engineer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48356 - 2010-03-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
According to Ashby, as indicated in a later affidavit, the evaluator said that C.H. was at least one
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173804 - 2017-09-21
According to Ashby, as indicated in a later affidavit, the evaluator said that C.H. was at least one
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173804 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
not properly supported by affidavits, and the trial court allowed them to correct that omission with additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45107 - 2009-12-29
not properly supported by affidavits, and the trial court allowed them to correct that omission with additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45107 - 2009-12-29
State v. Terrance A. Garner
: (1) his brother’s affidavit constitutes newly discovered evidence warranting a new trial; (2) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3775 - 2005-03-31
: (1) his brother’s affidavit constitutes newly discovered evidence warranting a new trial; (2) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3775 - 2005-03-31