Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6551 - 6560 of 62304 for child support.

State v. Dominic E.W.
that the evidence as applied to the statutory criteria set forth in § 970.032, Stats., supported a transfer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12928 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Brown County Department of Human Services v. Virjean L.
. BACKGROUND ¶2 On April 18, 2003, the court entered an order finding Virjean L.’s daughter a child in need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26560 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Dominic E.W.
, § 970.032 (title), (1) and (2)(c), STATS., was amended so that all references to “child” and “children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12928 - 2017-09-21

Kimberly S. S. v. Sebastian X. L.
and of the conditions necessary for the child to be returned to the home ....” See §§ 48.356(1) and 938.356(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7678 - 2005-05-09

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
sexual assault of a child in Outagamie County. In order to obtain a conviction on the bail jumping
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216042 - 2018-07-24

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
, and their child, K. M., Joel Jensen and Carrie Jensen, and their child, N. J., Scott Kulla and Mary Kulla
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31069 - 2008-01-29

[PDF] WI APP 4
MCMANUS AND MOIRA MCMANUS, AND THEIR CHILD, K. M., JOEL JENSEN AND CARRIE JENSEN, AND THEIR CHILD, N
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31069 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] David J. Dowiasch v. Tracy L. Dowiasch
of the anticipated income used to calculate child support. Tracy and David stipulated that David would pay $200 per
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15026 - 2017-09-21

David J. Dowiasch v. Tracy L. Dowiasch
in child support. To divide the April 1996 milk checks as part of the marital estate would be unfair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15026 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Robert C.
to support the trial court’s affirmative answer to the first question of the special verdict: “Have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12945 - 2017-09-21