Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6551 - 6560 of 40447 for probate forms/1000.
Search results 6551 - 6560 of 40447 for probate forms/1000.
CA Blank Order
with a sentence Anderson was serving after the revocation of probation in a Milwaukee county case, Anderson
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113543 - 2014-06-03
with a sentence Anderson was serving after the revocation of probation in a Milwaukee county case, Anderson
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113543 - 2014-06-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
one year of probation, consistent with the parties’ joint recommendation. The record discloses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188877 - 2017-09-21
one year of probation, consistent with the parties’ joint recommendation. The record discloses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188877 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a six-year sentence and ordered four years of probation, consistent with the parties’ joint
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245022 - 2019-08-13
a six-year sentence and ordered four years of probation, consistent with the parties’ joint
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245022 - 2019-08-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
mental harm to a child, with three-year terms of probation on each of the witness intimidation counts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597920 - 2022-12-06
mental harm to a child, with three-year terms of probation on each of the witness intimidation counts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597920 - 2022-12-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and ordered four years’ probation with nine months’ jail time as a condition. There is no manifest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220312 - 2018-10-02
, and ordered four years’ probation with nine months’ jail time as a condition. There is no manifest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220312 - 2018-10-02
Rudy Treml v. Michael Krippner
that the “Defendant” had filed false and harassing complaints with town officials. Treml asked for $1000 in damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3936 - 2005-03-31
that the “Defendant” had filed false and harassing complaints with town officials. Treml asked for $1000 in damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3936 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rudy Treml v. Michael Krippner
complaints with town officials. Treml asked for $1000 in damages. ¶4 The Krippners filed an answer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3936 - 2017-09-20
complaints with town officials. Treml asked for $1000 in damages. ¶4 The Krippners filed an answer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3936 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with them. ¶7 In outlining LaRose’s correctional experience, the PSI recounted LaRose’s probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932652 - 2025-03-25
with them. ¶7 In outlining LaRose’s correctional experience, the PSI recounted LaRose’s probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932652 - 2025-03-25
[PDF]
Certification
years of probation. In arguing for that sentence, counsel said that Odom was exposed to “a lot
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192210 - 2017-09-21
years of probation. In arguing for that sentence, counsel said that Odom was exposed to “a lot
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192210 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 34
addressed was “whether confinement in the county jail as a condition of probation, with or without work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31611 - 2014-09-15
addressed was “whether confinement in the county jail as a condition of probation, with or without work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31611 - 2014-09-15