Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6551 - 6560 of 20925 for word.
Search results 6551 - 6560 of 20925 for word.
[PDF]
Otis Elevator Co. v. Fulcrum Construction Co.
person would understand the words to mean
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25979 - 2017-09-21
person would understand the words to mean
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25979 - 2017-09-21
Louis Zink, Jr. v. Akhatar Khwaja
consistently uses certain words in a single sense, we must assume that the legislature expressed its intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15014 - 2005-03-31
consistently uses certain words in a single sense, we must assume that the legislature expressed its intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15014 - 2005-03-31
Taylor County Human Services Department v. Christine A.J.
the conditions established for the return of the child to the home. In other words, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10754 - 2005-03-31
the conditions established for the return of the child to the home. In other words, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10754 - 2005-03-31
State v. David R.W.
“there was a likelihood that the jury would not believe [M.W.’s] accusation against [Roberts]. In other words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10758 - 2005-03-31
“there was a likelihood that the jury would not believe [M.W.’s] accusation against [Roberts]. In other words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10758 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
results.” Id., ¶46. We also interpret statutory language so as to “give reasonable effect to every word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34521 - 2008-11-05
results.” Id., ¶46. We also interpret statutory language so as to “give reasonable effect to every word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34521 - 2008-11-05
Jill Hilts v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company
, 2004 WI App 40, ¶18, 271 Wis. 2d 163, 677 N.W.2d 718, we held that the meaning of the word endorsement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20385 - 2005-12-01
, 2004 WI App 40, ¶18, 271 Wis. 2d 163, 677 N.W.2d 718, we held that the meaning of the word endorsement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20385 - 2005-12-01
Alisa Zehetner v. Chrysler Financial Company, LLC
definitions, this court construes all words according to their common and approved usage[.]” Granado v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6548 - 2005-03-31
definitions, this court construes all words according to their common and approved usage[.]” Granado v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6548 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. In other words, as long as “any possibility exists” that the jury could have drawn “appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244070 - 2019-07-23
. In other words, as long as “any possibility exists” that the jury could have drawn “appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244070 - 2019-07-23
COURT OF APPEALS
on the camera.” The court added that beyond that, there would be “no mention of the word penis.” The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94724 - 2013-04-02
on the camera.” The court added that beyond that, there would be “no mention of the word penis.” The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94724 - 2013-04-02
Phyllis M. Landis v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Inc.
unambiguous words. See Nelson, 211 Wis. 2d at 495-96 ("If the meaning of a statute is clear from its language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2231 - 2005-03-31
unambiguous words. See Nelson, 211 Wis. 2d at 495-96 ("If the meaning of a statute is clear from its language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2231 - 2005-03-31