Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6561 - 6570 of 12912 for prosecuting.
Search results 6561 - 6570 of 12912 for prosecuting.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 16, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court ...
of the prosecution’s case.” Id. at 2531 n.1. The main focus in Melendez-Diaz was on the defendant’s right to confront
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69506 - 2011-08-15
of the prosecution’s case.” Id. at 2531 n.1. The main focus in Melendez-Diaz was on the defendant’s right to confront
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69506 - 2011-08-15
State v. Michael R. Nelson
for any fair and just reason unless the prosecution would be substantially prejudiced). Nelson asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2736 - 2005-03-31
for any fair and just reason unless the prosecution would be substantially prejudiced). Nelson asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2736 - 2005-03-31
State v. Juan Jesus S.
as Class A misdemeanors. For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14480 - 2005-03-31
as Class A misdemeanors. For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14480 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the prosecution said would happen if [the witness] lied on the stand, whether [the witness] had told the truth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85278 - 2012-07-23
the prosecution said would happen if [the witness] lied on the stand, whether [the witness] had told the truth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85278 - 2012-07-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
to close the case, enter into a deferred prosecution agreement, or refer the matter to the district
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27053 - 2014-09-15
to close the case, enter into a deferred prosecution agreement, or refer the matter to the district
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27053 - 2014-09-15
State v. Sebastian Molina
attention. In fact, counsel’s redirect examination shows that he was aware of the prosecution’s line
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6143 - 2005-03-31
attention. In fact, counsel’s redirect examination shows that he was aware of the prosecution’s line
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6143 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
prosecution for the crime. The circuit court found Moss’s explanation for his silence “not credible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64048 - 2014-09-15
prosecution for the crime. The circuit court found Moss’s explanation for his silence “not credible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64048 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
first determine that prosecutive merit exists for the No. 2013AP1337 3 delinquency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102299 - 2017-09-21
first determine that prosecutive merit exists for the No. 2013AP1337 3 delinquency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102299 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
a no-contest plea to the OWI causing injury charge and the other charges were dismissed.[2] The prosecution
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121009 - 2014-09-09
a no-contest plea to the OWI causing injury charge and the other charges were dismissed.[2] The prosecution
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121009 - 2014-09-09
City of Sheboygan v. Earl R. Thill
which had been used to obtain the state’s DNA prosecution evidence. See Peters, 192 Wis.2d at 682-84
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11292 - 2005-03-31
which had been used to obtain the state’s DNA prosecution evidence. See Peters, 192 Wis.2d at 682-84
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11292 - 2005-03-31