Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6561 - 6570 of 63511 for records.
Search results 6561 - 6570 of 63511 for records.
COURT OF APPEALS
and discipline, and the case was returned to the adjustment committee for correction of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62851 - 2011-04-13
and discipline, and the case was returned to the adjustment committee for correction of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62851 - 2011-04-13
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
. The record is unclear as to the disposition of that motion. First, McClellan argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7910 - 2005-03-31
. The record is unclear as to the disposition of that motion. First, McClellan argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7910 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
because he could have raised this issue in his earlier Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion. The records show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50733 - 2010-06-07
because he could have raised this issue in his earlier Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion. The records show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50733 - 2010-06-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response, and has elected not to do so. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1029613 - 2025-10-28
a response, and has elected not to do so. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1029613 - 2025-10-28
[PDF]
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
. The record is unclear as to the disposition of that motion. First, McClellan argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8138 - 2017-09-19
. The record is unclear as to the disposition of that motion. First, McClellan argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8138 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and discipline, and the case was returned to the adjustment committee for correction of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62851 - 2014-09-15
and discipline, and the case was returned to the adjustment committee for correction of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62851 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Charles E. Carthage
of the charges were dismissed but read into the record at sentencing. ¶5 The circuit court eventually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6431 - 2017-09-19
of the charges were dismissed but read into the record at sentencing. ¶5 The circuit court eventually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6431 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jacob J.W.
2 circuit court erroneously exercised its jurisdiction because the record does not contain clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7400 - 2017-09-20
2 circuit court erroneously exercised its jurisdiction because the record does not contain clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7400 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. John L. Williams
unreasonable or unjustified basis in the record for the sentence of which the defendant complains. Id., 119
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11348 - 2017-09-19
unreasonable or unjustified basis in the record for the sentence of which the defendant complains. Id., 119
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11348 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jimmy Thomas
unless the defendant shows some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9767 - 2005-03-31
unless the defendant shows some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9767 - 2005-03-31