Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 65601 - 65610 of 82637 for simple case.

[PDF] State v. Dennis M. Heath
. The plain error rule is reserved for cases in which it is likely that the error denied the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15152 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Shaker Alkhalidi
1 The victims in this case were under the age of thirteen. The appellant’s counsel failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13068 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Antwan Battles
imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or another. We just don’t have those facts in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10871 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Charles Gray Beverage Company, Inc. v. Utica Mutual Insurance Company
affidavits, to determine whether that party has made a prima facie case for summary judgment. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10410 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Dorothy A. Lowe v. City of Appleton
and remand the case for a new trial on grounds that the jury's verdict is inconsistent and perverse. Lowe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9303 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
had been convicted of a sexually violent offense. In this case, that required the State to prove
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237831 - 2019-03-19

COURT OF APPEALS
, and apply it to the facts of this case. Interpretation and application of a statute are questions of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121562 - 2014-09-16

Douglas County v. Steven Leinweber
the “totality of the circumstances.” Id. at 139-40. ¶7 In this case the two-step standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2224 - 2005-03-31

State v. Stacy D. Davis
, a defendant may very well wish to shift the focus of scrutiny from himself to the victim, in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3403 - 2005-03-31

State v. Cleveland Brown
voices or feeling too depressed to make a decision in your case today? THE DEFENDANT: No. I got my
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19345 - 2005-08-22