Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 65851 - 65860 of 74636 for public records.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
: issue raised is a legal question that can be disposed of “based upon a consideration of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142876 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] City of New Berlin v. Dennis Barker
in the record supported a finding of reasonable suspicion. ¶10 In his response brief, Barker conceded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6137 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Ilir Aliji
) (citations omitted). Here, the trial court put the arrest into proper context: Based on the records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14150 - 2014-09-15

2008 WI APP 9
in the record indicating the testimony of Brown that she stopped the vehicle as soon as she could in traffic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31236 - 2008-01-29

State v. William L. Morford
of discretion where the record demonstrates that the trial court applied the wrong legal standard, failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4377 - 2005-03-31

Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Renee J. M.
in the record where she requested an evidentiary hearing on the matter or even raised an issue regarding who had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3455 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jermaine V. Dantzler
Davion’s prior injuries. ¶11 Second, the record shows that the trial court examined the correct factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4044 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
,’ and if the decision was made ‘in accordance with accepted legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=345151 - 2021-03-11

COURT OF APPEALS
did not reasonably rely on Megan’s apparent authority. ¶19 Our review of the record persuades us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34113 - 2008-09-24

[PDF] State v. Robert Fowler
WI 67 at ¶19. However, the court went on to observe that conflicting evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2337 - 2017-09-19