Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 65881 - 65890 of 74636 for public records.

State v. David Barton
of the relevant records, it was her opinion that the substance tested in this case contained cocaine base.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20764 - 2006-01-24

COURT OF APPEALS
or if the record otherwise conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88603 - 2012-10-22

[PDF] State v. Phonesavanh Vanmanivong
of “Shorty” from the photos are not included in the record. 3 We note that there appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3335 - 2017-09-19

La Crosse County Human Services Department v. Heather Z.
). We thus undertake an independent review to determine whether the record provides a basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14911 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] City of New Berlin v. Dennis Barker
in the record supported a finding of reasonable suspicion. ¶10 In his response brief, Barker conceded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6138 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
standards and with the facts of record.” State v. Brecht, 143 Wis. 2d 297, 320, 421 N.W.2d 96 (1988
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211706 - 2018-04-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in the record pointing to his guilt, ‘he is entitled to an explanation of why the disciplinary board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239678 - 2019-04-25

[PDF] CA Blank Order
barred. Upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this matter
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=463880 - 2021-12-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. These findings of fact are supported by the record and are not clearly erroneous. However, we independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145690 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] James H. Cameron v. Jane P. Cameron
of the trial court if there are facts in the record to support the decision. In re Estate of Anderson, 147
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8588 - 2017-09-19