Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6591 - 6600 of 19202 for transfer by affidavit.
Search results 6591 - 6600 of 19202 for transfer by affidavit.
[PDF]
State v. Dennis J. Kivioja
he and Kivioja were held there, Stehle requested a transfer, Nos. 97-2932-CR & 97-2933-CR
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17310 - 2017-09-21
he and Kivioja were held there, Stehle requested a transfer, Nos. 97-2932-CR & 97-2933-CR
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17310 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Partners In Design Architects, Inc. v. Phoenix Internet Technologies, Inc.
affidavit. ¶10 Proof of damages on default judgment varies depending on whether the claim sounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3651 - 2017-09-19
affidavit. ¶10 Proof of damages on default judgment varies depending on whether the claim sounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3651 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Willie S. Gray, Jr.
to investigate his claimed alibi witnesses. Gray submitted an affidavit, contending that his two alibi
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14056 - 2014-09-15
to investigate his claimed alibi witnesses. Gray submitted an affidavit, contending that his two alibi
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14056 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
five months later, on August 15, 2018, and states: “affidavit of service.” Six months after
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=895058 - 2024-12-23
five months later, on August 15, 2018, and states: “affidavit of service.” Six months after
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=895058 - 2024-12-23
Partners In Design Architects, Inc. v. Phoenix Internet Technologies, Inc.
Partners’ complaint as alleging a breach of contract claim and awarded damages based on counsel’s affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3651 - 2005-03-31
Partners’ complaint as alleging a breach of contract claim and awarded damages based on counsel’s affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3651 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eugene Keeler
hearing was not supported by an affidavit regarding the facts surrounding the jury tampering allegations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8070 - 2005-03-31
hearing was not supported by an affidavit regarding the facts surrounding the jury tampering allegations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8070 - 2005-03-31
Ronald A. Keith, Sr. v. State of Wisconsin Resource Center
respondents’ motion was supported by affidavits and other evidence, the trial court treated the motion as one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15599 - 2005-03-31
respondents’ motion was supported by affidavits and other evidence, the trial court treated the motion as one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15599 - 2005-03-31
Ramiro Estrada v. State
or that counsel adopted the videotape as his own work product. Tammy’s affidavit states only that the attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14691 - 2005-03-31
or that counsel adopted the videotape as his own work product. Tammy’s affidavit states only that the attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14691 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
party’s affidavits to determine whether they establish a prima facie case for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30603 - 2007-10-15
party’s affidavits to determine whether they establish a prima facie case for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30603 - 2007-10-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in which the inmate is confined. Sec. 302.113(9g)(c). The petition must be accompanied by affidavits
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346589 - 2021-03-16
in which the inmate is confined. Sec. 302.113(9g)(c). The petition must be accompanied by affidavits
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346589 - 2021-03-16