Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 661 - 670 of 1306 for pipe.

State v. Anthony Johnson
quantities of ziploc bags, pipes, cocaine grinders, test tubes, copper mesh screens, and other items. Most
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9964 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, the officers searched the vehicle and recovered drugs and a methamphetamine pipe. Based on this incident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737176 - 2023-12-05

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a large amount of methamphetamine and six glass pipes in a duffel bag. Another witness told law
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=586407 - 2022-11-08

State v. Michael V.P.
observed a silver-colored pipe that contained marijuana residue. At that juncture, Osell placed Michael
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15463 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 28, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
gave the deputy the pipe he had been using to smoke the marijuana. He was charged with possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27611 - 2006-12-27

Rawson Contractors, Inc. v. Lisbon Sanitary District No. 1
to excavate streets, install the sanitary sewer pipe, backfill the trenches, install the laterals to the lot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7911 - 2005-03-31

State v. Shawn E. Avery
then gave consent for a pat-down search, which revealed a marijuana pipe and marijuana in Avery’s pocket
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4227 - 2005-03-31

GPI Corporation v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
and affirm the order. BACKGROUND ¶2 GPI manufactures chemical storage tanks, air scrubbers, piping
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24767 - 2006-04-10

[PDF] Robin A. Arnold v. John C. Robbins, Jr.
that the Thompsons were aware of the well No. 96-0570 -5- pipe and cement pads when they purchased
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10442 - 2017-09-20

Robin A. Arnold v. John C. Robbins, Jr.
of the well pipe and cement pads when they purchased Lot 5. It also found the Seymours had never pointed out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10442 - 2005-03-31