Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 661 - 670 of 6396 for wide.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
afford great deference to trial counsel’s conduct, presuming that it ‘falls within the wide range
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=588824 - 2022-11-10

[PDF] Nagawicka Bay Sailing Club Owners Association, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
into the lake. The pier was 56 feet long and 3.5 feet wide, with two “Ts” of approximately 33 feet in width
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11499 - 2017-09-19

James S. Cook v. David H. Schwarz
of counsel which were “outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance.” Strickland, 466 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13176 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Radunka Runjo v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company
and informed consent.” We are not persuaded by Chrzan's arguments. A trial court has wide discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8200 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 163
not have occurred until the city-wide assessment in 2009 and that the sale itself would not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42744 - 2014-09-15

State v. David A. Foy
, the identified acts or omissions were outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance." State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10486 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. David A. Foy
it is shown that, "in light of all the circumstances, the identified acts or omissions were outside the wide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10486 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Derrick A. Stevens
performance, the defendant must identify specific acts or omissions of counsel that fall “outside the wide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18443 - 2017-09-21

Gerald Trott v. Wisconsin Department of Health & Family Services
of doors. Gerald needs a 20” wide size to accommodate his hip and trunk width. An adjustable angle back
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2656 - 2005-03-31

Mark Ansani v. Cascade Mountain, Inc.
placed on the ski slope) is contributorily negligent as a matter of law. The circuit court has wide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13340 - 2005-03-31