Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6601 - 6610 of 20931 for word.
Search results 6601 - 6610 of 20931 for word.
2011 WI APP 23
). The word “may” in a statute generally allows for the exercise of discretion, as opposed to the word “shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58834 - 2011-02-15
). The word “may” in a statute generally allows for the exercise of discretion, as opposed to the word “shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58834 - 2011-02-15
COURT OF APPEALS
based upon an imputed earning capacity. In other words, the merits of the child support motion had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33495 - 2008-07-23
based upon an imputed earning capacity. In other words, the merits of the child support motion had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33495 - 2008-07-23
State v. Kevin Ryan
to speak with him. Ryan then said, “[c]an’t you have a word with my Smith & Wesson?” pulled out the gun
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14519 - 2005-03-31
to speak with him. Ryan then said, “[c]an’t you have a word with my Smith & Wesson?” pulled out the gun
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14519 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
as to “give reasonable effect to every word, in order to avoid surplusage.” Id. ¶17 WISCONSIN STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34521 - 2014-09-15
as to “give reasonable effect to every word, in order to avoid surplusage.” Id. ¶17 WISCONSIN STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34521 - 2014-09-15
State v. Virgil Marzell Smith
of the word “never” resulted in the failure to differentiate between pre-Miranda and post-Miranda silence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20879 - 2006-01-09
of the word “never” resulted in the failure to differentiate between pre-Miranda and post-Miranda silence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20879 - 2006-01-09
State v. George Taylor
worded order, it ruled: Based on this decision [Erickson], the respondent’s remaining contention raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13870 - 2005-03-31
worded order, it ruled: Based on this decision [Erickson], the respondent’s remaining contention raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13870 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
he was searching, and he was acting cautiously.” In order words, while Harris argues Neibauer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50188 - 2010-05-24
he was searching, and he was acting cautiously.” In order words, while Harris argues Neibauer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50188 - 2010-05-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of West Bend v. Wilkens, 2005 WI App 36, ¶17, 278 Wis. 2d 643, 693 N.W.2d 324. In other words, field
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175017 - 2017-09-21
of West Bend v. Wilkens, 2005 WI App 36, ¶17, 278 Wis. 2d 643, 693 N.W.2d 324. In other words, field
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175017 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that it was ‘in a position to issue an order’ or ‘ready’ to do so, but it never said the simple words ‘[Appleton] hereby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61134 - 2011-03-14
that it was ‘in a position to issue an order’ or ‘ready’ to do so, but it never said the simple words ‘[Appleton] hereby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61134 - 2011-03-14
State v. Lester Young
Young’s counsel made such a motion, the trial court would have denied it. The word “owner” as used in Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15919 - 2005-03-31
Young’s counsel made such a motion, the trial court would have denied it. The word “owner” as used in Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15919 - 2005-03-31