Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 66001 - 66010 of 75347 for judgment for us.

[PDF] State v. Alfred Sharpe
was imposed. As used in this subsection, "actual days spent in custody" includes, without limitation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7716 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
or identified any reason that would cause us to lack confidence in that procedure. Fernandez argues that he has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84850 - 2012-11-13

[PDF] 00-09 Amendment of Wis. Stats. s. 801.16(2) - Filing Papers by Facsimile Transmission (Effective 07-01-01)
) (a) A court may adopt a local rule, if it is approved by the chief judge, that requires the use of a plain
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] IW-1724 - Form Summary
Comments: This form is intended to be used in both ch. 48 and ch. 938 matters. • If this is the first
/formdisplay/IW-1724_summary.pdf?formNumber=IW-1724&formType=Summary&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-01-07

Dennis J. Arnold v. City of Milwaukee
, and we are bound by the record as it comes to us. Duhame v. Duhame, 154 Wis.2d 258, 269, 453 N.W.2d 149
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10352 - 2005-03-31

Donald S. James v. Tim Wilkening
by the prisoner to a pleading and treat a matter as if the right procedural tool was used.” State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21030 - 2006-01-23

State v. Covan A. Gavitt
Judge Howard was a "new judge" as that term is used in § 971.20(5), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10195 - 2005-03-31

Roberto M. Hinojosa v. John Husz
. That is not accurate. The rules the board used to evaluate Hinojosa’s parole eligibility were in existence in 1983
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15170 - 2005-03-31

State v. Bernard B. Krier
, 464 N.W.2d 230, 231 (Ct. App. 1990). The form used by the arresting officer fully advised Krier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10537 - 2005-03-31

Michael A. Pharo v. Wisconsin Department of Labor & Industry Review Commission
. That determination was made using standards provided in Wis. Stat. § 108.22(9) (2001-02).[1] That statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6054 - 2005-03-31