Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 66081 - 66090 of 68969 for had.

State v. Lenny Keding
available in Wood County, where he had previously worked, and the closest group home in Portage County did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11617 - 2005-03-31

State v. Steve Norton
questioned Hubbard about the decision, and she explained that the department had elected an alternative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3445 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction had not “set a date” for parole eligibility but, rather, stated Hampton was sentenced to “life
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201514 - 2017-11-07

[PDF] CA Blank Order
he had just killed her. Posey then left the residence. The victim regained consciousness
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231686 - 2019-01-09

[PDF] CA Blank Order
an exception to the condition had it known more about his relationship with his daughter. Pristelski also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699347 - 2023-09-06

COURT OF APPEALS
factors: (1) the sentencing court had not considered the ABA standards for consecutive sentences; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33533 - 2008-07-30

[PDF] CA Blank Order
had a “rational and explainable basis.” State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶76, 270 Wis. 2d 535, 678 N.W
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228321 - 2018-11-28

State v. Malcolm J. Muller
could and that he had two pocketknives on his person. Lantz found the pocketknives and judged them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18820 - 2005-07-05

[MS WORD] JD-1786T: Order for Revision of Dispositional Order with Termination of Parental Rights Notice
. · You have not had a substantial parental relationship with the child. |_| Continuing Parental
/formdisplay/JD-1786T.doc?formNumber=JD-1786T&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-04-22

[PDF] Village of Hales Corners v. Michael V. Hendricks
) (No. 00- 3530). Thus, the circuit court correctly concluded that it had no jurisdiction. Todorvic v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6481 - 2017-09-19