Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6611 - 6620 of 24440 for extending.

[PDF] Supreme Court rule petition 17-07
is necessary for prosecution of the appeal, unless the court extends the time for transmittal of the record
/supreme/docs/1707petition.pdf - 2017-05-30

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - March 2016
, the circuit court gave a fairly extended sentencing statement. It listed the goals of the sentence
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163220 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - January 2019
suspicion, unlawfully extend a routine traffic stop? 1 WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT January 16, 2019
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231853 - 2019-01-07

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - April 2008
of extended supervision on the false imprisonment count and 15 years of initial confinement and 10 years
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32325 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
and extended supervision. At the combined plea and sentencing hearing, the parties also filed a form entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87402 - 2012-09-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
commenced on March 15, 1999, and MCTC exercised all four of its contractual options to extend the lease
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974811 - 2025-06-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to herein by the pseudonym Lucy, appeals from an order extending her involuntary commitment under WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=918301 - 2025-02-26

[PDF] Town of Neenah Sanitary District No. 2 v. City of Neenah
request to extend sewer service without stating objective reasons for doing so. Based on the clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4393 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Rosemary S.A.
to “no,” on the grounds that an order extending Alchilseaya’s CHIPS disposition had not contained the statutorily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15829 - 2017-09-21

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Rosemary S.A.
, or alternatively, changing the answer to question 1 of that verdict to “no,” on the grounds that an order extending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15827 - 2005-03-31