Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6611 - 6620 of 56136 for so.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to consider restitution. The court and the parties instead agreed to have a calendar call so the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=719352 - 2023-10-24

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
, was advised of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. Upon consideration
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997634 - 2025-08-20

State v. Levelt D. Musgraves
was so great that it likely resulted in a total lack of communication that prevented an adequate defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9121 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 21, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
for the abandonment. We agree and, therefore, reverse and remand this case so the trial court may consider whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27212 - 2006-11-20

State v. Ramon Sanchez-Diaz
to the trial court so that he could file a motion claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. We denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16210 - 2005-03-31

State v. Dawn L. Bogumill
established in a fashion so that additional individuals could fall within the classes.” Every member of each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4624 - 2005-03-31

The Estate of Lucille A. Salwey v. Connie S. Klein
if Manufacturer has a mortgage interest and, if so, when it arose. Background ¶2 It appears the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7137 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
sentence, the sentence was not so excessive so as to shock the public’s sentiment. See Ocanas v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970552 - 2025-06-18

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not done so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118470 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. 2d 95, 622 N.W.2d 449, and is not so excessive so as to shock the public’s sentiment, see Ocanas v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266390 - 2020-07-07