Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6621 - 6630 of 24440 for extending.

Berrell Freeman v. Gerald Berge
extended for cause and upon notice, and if the CCE does not do so, the decision appealed from is affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4631 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
years’ initial confinement and two years’ extended supervision for the battery, one year of initial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140058 - 2015-04-14

[PDF] La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Rosemary S.A.
to “no,” on the grounds that an order extending Alchilseaya’s CHIPS disposition had not contained the statutorily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15827 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Rosemary S.A.
to “no,” on the grounds that an order extending Alchilseaya’s CHIPS disposition had not contained the statutorily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15826 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
[of] extended supervision, [and] place Mr. Gates on probation for six years with conditions that he serve nine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112198 - 2014-05-12

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
storage bin, her clothing got caught on an unshielded, rotating bolt that extended outward from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84419 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Peter C. Ramuta
confinement of five years, and two years of extended supervision. These sentences were consecutive to each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5296 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Derrick C. Montriel
, with eight years of initial confinement and four years of extended supervision. 2 After establishing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7289 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
with a significant period of extended supervision. Brown’s trial counsel acknowledged that Brown has “an alcohol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=579413 - 2022-10-18

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Rosemary S.A.
, or alternatively, changing the answer to question 1 of that verdict to “no,” on the grounds that an order extending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15829 - 2005-03-31