Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6621 - 6630 of 12913 for prosecuting.
Search results 6621 - 6630 of 12913 for prosecuting.
Malcolm H. v. Marc J. Ackerman
to questions on direct and cross-examination and could be subject to prosecution if he perjured himself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11441 - 2005-03-31
to questions on direct and cross-examination and could be subject to prosecution if he perjured himself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11441 - 2005-03-31
State v. Victor Villalobos
being with intent to kill that person or another is guilty of a Class B felony if: (a) In prosecutions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7985 - 2005-03-31
being with intent to kill that person or another is guilty of a Class B felony if: (a) In prosecutions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7985 - 2005-03-31
County of Dunn v. Laurence E. Eccles
would decide on prosecution on the matter depending on what the actual concentration was under .10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13041 - 2005-03-31
would decide on prosecution on the matter depending on what the actual concentration was under .10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13041 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 5, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
the prosecution and the defendant. Therefore, we reverse and remand so the court may either hold an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27332 - 2006-12-04
the prosecution and the defendant. Therefore, we reverse and remand so the court may either hold an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27332 - 2006-12-04
State v. Lyle I. Dank
and the prosecution objected to his testimony. On voir dire, the principal stated that in his opinion, J.G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9568 - 2005-03-31
and the prosecution objected to his testimony. On voir dire, the principal stated that in his opinion, J.G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9568 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as part of the prosecution’s case.” Id. at 2531 n.1. The main focus in Melendez-Diaz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69506 - 2014-09-15
as part of the prosecution’s case.” Id. at 2531 n.1. The main focus in Melendez-Diaz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69506 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the parties referred to a deferred “prosecution” agreement, it is more properly described as a deferred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208260 - 2018-02-13
the parties referred to a deferred “prosecution” agreement, it is more properly described as a deferred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208260 - 2018-02-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(1) provides that: No action shall be dismissed on the ground that it is not prosecuted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96022 - 2014-09-15
(1) provides that: No action shall be dismissed on the ground that it is not prosecuted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96022 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
-in at sentencing. ¶3 Pursuant to the plea agreement, the prosecution made no sentencing recommendation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60429 - 2011-03-01
-in at sentencing. ¶3 Pursuant to the plea agreement, the prosecution made no sentencing recommendation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60429 - 2011-03-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. § 971.14(5)(a)-(c). When competency is restored, the prosecution resumes. See WIS. STAT. § 971.14(4
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175436 - 2017-09-21
. § 971.14(5)(a)-(c). When competency is restored, the prosecution resumes. See WIS. STAT. § 971.14(4
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175436 - 2017-09-21