Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6631 - 6640 of 12912 for prosecuting.
Search results 6631 - 6640 of 12912 for prosecuting.
State v. Lyle I. Dank
and the prosecution objected to his testimony. On voir dire, the principal stated that in his opinion, J.G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9568 - 2005-03-31
and the prosecution objected to his testimony. On voir dire, the principal stated that in his opinion, J.G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9568 - 2005-03-31
State v. Donavin Hemphill
was offered unsolicited by the victim or witness, and was not generated by the desire of the prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19482 - 2005-12-11
was offered unsolicited by the victim or witness, and was not generated by the desire of the prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19482 - 2005-12-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
fair and just reason for withdrawal, unless the prosecution has been substantially prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79523 - 2014-09-15
fair and just reason for withdrawal, unless the prosecution has been substantially prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79523 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as part of the prosecution’s case.” Id. at 2531 n.1. The main focus in Melendez-Diaz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69506 - 2014-09-15
as part of the prosecution’s case.” Id. at 2531 n.1. The main focus in Melendez-Diaz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69506 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Juan Jesus S.
as Class A misdemeanors. For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that prosecution for both offenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14480 - 2017-09-21
as Class A misdemeanors. For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that prosecution for both offenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14480 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not be prosecuted in the state of Washington; and (4) his agreement not to contest deportation proceedings
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=388700 - 2021-07-13
not be prosecuted in the state of Washington; and (4) his agreement not to contest deportation proceedings
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=388700 - 2021-07-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the parties referred to a deferred “prosecution” agreement, it is more properly described as a deferred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208260 - 2018-02-13
the parties referred to a deferred “prosecution” agreement, it is more properly described as a deferred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208260 - 2018-02-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(1) provides that: No action shall be dismissed on the ground that it is not prosecuted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96022 - 2014-09-15
(1) provides that: No action shall be dismissed on the ground that it is not prosecuted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96022 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
-in at sentencing. ¶3 Pursuant to the plea agreement, the prosecution made no sentencing recommendation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60429 - 2011-03-01
-in at sentencing. ¶3 Pursuant to the plea agreement, the prosecution made no sentencing recommendation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60429 - 2011-03-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. § 971.14(5)(a)-(c). When competency is restored, the prosecution resumes. See WIS. STAT. § 971.14(4
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175436 - 2017-09-21
. § 971.14(5)(a)-(c). When competency is restored, the prosecution resumes. See WIS. STAT. § 971.14(4
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175436 - 2017-09-21