Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6641 - 6650 of 9138 for jurors.
Search results 6641 - 6650 of 9138 for jurors.
COURT OF APPEALS
that Holmes may have had a prior OWI conviction would not affect a reasonable juror when determining Holmes’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51335 - 2010-06-23
that Holmes may have had a prior OWI conviction would not affect a reasonable juror when determining Holmes’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51335 - 2010-06-23
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the cars of two jurors, a State’s witnesses’ testimony about a prior theft by Hart; and (3) the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977902 - 2025-07-02
of the cars of two jurors, a State’s witnesses’ testimony about a prior theft by Hart; and (3) the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977902 - 2025-07-02
State v. Patrick D. O'Donnell
that the evidence was prejudicial because “drug activity” could also be understood by jurors to imply involvement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14878 - 2005-03-31
that the evidence was prejudicial because “drug activity” could also be understood by jurors to imply involvement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14878 - 2005-03-31
State v. Alvernice O. Sellers
provided ineffective assistance of counsel because he did not attempt to strike juror Mary Williams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6698 - 2005-03-31
provided ineffective assistance of counsel because he did not attempt to strike juror Mary Williams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6698 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
have prompted jurors to question Mary’s credibility. See State v. Jeannie M.P., 2005 WI App 183, ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31404 - 2014-09-15
have prompted jurors to question Mary’s credibility. See State v. Jeannie M.P., 2005 WI App 183, ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31404 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
must have considered the statements for an improper purpose. To the contrary, jurors can be presumed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94977 - 2014-09-15
must have considered the statements for an improper purpose. To the contrary, jurors can be presumed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94977 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
of peremptory challenges to strike all the potential male jurors from the panel. The court explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60037 - 2014-09-15
of peremptory challenges to strike all the potential male jurors from the panel. The court explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60037 - 2014-09-15
State v. Daniel C. Clussman
allowed the jurors to consider whether Grote’s conduct exceeded her lawful authority. Absent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13554 - 2005-03-31
allowed the jurors to consider whether Grote’s conduct exceeded her lawful authority. Absent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13554 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jason S. Smith
in the vandalism. ¶14 Smith nonetheless claims that the real controversy was not fully tried because jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5080 - 2017-09-19
in the vandalism. ¶14 Smith nonetheless claims that the real controversy was not fully tried because jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5080 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
that the evidence convinces him [or her] and should convince the jurors.’” Id. (citation omitted). The prosecutor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98007 - 2013-06-11
that the evidence convinces him [or her] and should convince the jurors.’” Id. (citation omitted). The prosecutor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98007 - 2013-06-11