Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 66411 - 66420 of 68575 for law.

CA Blank Order
with,” and acknowledged that, “I know I broke the law.” [6] We note that at the initial appearance conducted March 16
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100950 - 2013-08-20

State v. Matthew R.L.
and misdemeanor possession of drug paraphernalia. The basis for the delinquency petition was that while law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12080 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the evidence is a question of law subject to our de novo review, we “consider the evidence in the light most
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817450 - 2024-06-27

Roland F. Sarko v. Examining Board of Architects
are not bound by an agency’s conclusions of law in the same manner as we are by its factual findings. Begel v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3892 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether the proffered fact or set of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145349 - 2015-07-30

[PDF] State v. Ilir Aliji
, is a question of law that we review independently. See id. To determine whether a confession was voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14150 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Racine County Human Services Department v. Timothy H.
that his termination was involuntary as a matter of law because his consent was induced by promises made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14299 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Racine County Human Services Department v. Timothy H.
that his termination was involuntary as a matter of law because his consent was induced by promises made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14298 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Elizabeth Mata
.” Law ¶8 WISCONSIN STAT. § 943.38(1)(a) states: Forgery. (1) Whoever with intent to defraud
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3142 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
, and the circuit court held a hearing to determine whether the seizure was lawful. ¶9 Officer Jill Zeise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46758 - 2014-09-15