Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 66421 - 66430 of 84057 for simple case search.
Search results 66421 - 66430 of 84057 for simple case search.
State v. Robert J. Ehmke
At the close of the State’s case, Ehmke moved the court to dismiss the charge. The court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15731 - 2005-03-31
At the close of the State’s case, Ehmke moved the court to dismiss the charge. The court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15731 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
consolidated Reed’s case with one of the co-actors (not the ringleader) in the interests of judicial economy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91196 - 2013-01-02
consolidated Reed’s case with one of the co-actors (not the ringleader) in the interests of judicial economy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91196 - 2013-01-02
CA Blank Order
proceeded to consider the standard sentencing factors and explained their application to this case. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146250 - 2015-08-11
proceeded to consider the standard sentencing factors and explained their application to this case. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146250 - 2015-08-11
State v. Bradford Lescher
of a seemingly endless trickle of cases emanating out of protests at abortion clinics located in Milwaukee County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8059 - 2005-03-31
of a seemingly endless trickle of cases emanating out of protests at abortion clinics located in Milwaukee County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8059 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154331 - 2017-09-21
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154331 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
was not bound.” Id., ¶73. ¶6 In this case, the record shows that the trial court did not personally advise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32221 - 2014-09-15
was not bound.” Id., ¶73. ¶6 In this case, the record shows that the trial court did not personally advise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32221 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
it is “closer to the evidence, sees and hears the witnesses, and decides more cases on the issue.” Id., ¶40
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123038 - 2014-10-07
it is “closer to the evidence, sees and hears the witnesses, and decides more cases on the issue.” Id., ¶40
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123038 - 2014-10-07
COURT OF APPEALS
) the defendant was not negligent in seeking evidence; (3) the evidence is material to an issue in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33521 - 2008-07-28
) the defendant was not negligent in seeking evidence; (3) the evidence is material to an issue in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33521 - 2008-07-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The Brazeaus’ contention mischaracterizes the procedural posture of the case, however. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1093532 - 2026-03-24
. The Brazeaus’ contention mischaracterizes the procedural posture of the case, however. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1093532 - 2026-03-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.’s case manager did not know where he was located, but he would occasionally call her
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=392919 - 2021-07-15
.’s case manager did not know where he was located, but he would occasionally call her
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=392919 - 2021-07-15