Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 66491 - 66500 of 77438 for j o e s.
Search results 66491 - 66500 of 77438 for j o e s.
COURT OF APPEALS
favorably to the [S]tate and the conviction, it is inherently or patently incredible, or so lacking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70797 - 2011-09-12
favorably to the [S]tate and the conviction, it is inherently or patently incredible, or so lacking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70797 - 2011-09-12
State v. Marjorie M. Veeser
Amendment to the U. S. Constitution and article I, section 11, of the Wisconsin Constitution each state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5194 - 2005-03-31
Amendment to the U. S. Constitution and article I, section 11, of the Wisconsin Constitution each state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5194 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the following opinion and order: 2024AP2-CR State of Wisconsin v. Michael S. O’Grady (L.C
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1014857 - 2025-09-25
the following opinion and order: 2024AP2-CR State of Wisconsin v. Michael S. O’Grady (L.C
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1014857 - 2025-09-25
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: lee s. dreyfus, jr., Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 CURLEY, P.J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102985 - 2013-10-14
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: lee s. dreyfus, jr., Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 CURLEY, P.J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102985 - 2013-10-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
id., ¶45. If the statute’s meaning is plain, we ordinarily stop the inquiry. Id. “[S]tatutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32647 - 2014-09-15
id., ¶45. If the statute’s meaning is plain, we ordinarily stop the inquiry. Id. “[S]tatutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32647 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 2009 WI 32, ¶3, 317 Wis. 2d 12, 765 N.W.2d 756. “This court ‘accord[s] great deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865051 - 2024-10-23
, 2009 WI 32, ¶3, 317 Wis. 2d 12, 765 N.W.2d 756. “This court ‘accord[s] great deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865051 - 2024-10-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous,” but it “independently determine[s] whether those facts demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71556 - 2014-09-15
they are clearly erroneous,” but it “independently determine[s] whether those facts demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71556 - 2014-09-15
State v. Branko Cvorovic
a judgment and orders of the circuit court for Kenosha County: Michael s. Fisher, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3080 - 2005-03-31
a judgment and orders of the circuit court for Kenosha County: Michael s. Fisher, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3080 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Owen Andrew Kreinus
by clear and convincing evidence: (1) the factor(s) was/were not in existence or was/were unknowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17754 - 2017-09-21
by clear and convincing evidence: (1) the factor(s) was/were not in existence or was/were unknowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17754 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
suspect[s], in light of his or her experience, that some kind of criminal activity has taken
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105735 - 2017-09-21
suspect[s], in light of his or her experience, that some kind of criminal activity has taken
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105735 - 2017-09-21