Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6651 - 6660 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 6651 - 6660 of 24568 for extending.
State v. Peter C. Ramuta
confinement of five years, and two years of extended supervision. These sentences were consecutive to each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5296 - 2005-03-31
confinement of five years, and two years of extended supervision. These sentences were consecutive to each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5296 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Rosemary S.A.
to “no,” on the grounds that an order extending Alchilseaya’s CHIPS disposition had not contained the statutorily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15827 - 2017-09-21
to “no,” on the grounds that an order extending Alchilseaya’s CHIPS disposition had not contained the statutorily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15827 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Economy Preferred Insurance Company v. Edward A. Solner and George D. Solner
dissent. I would not extend Elliott v. Donahue, 169 Wis.2d 310, 485 N.W.2d 403 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9272 - 2017-09-19
dissent. I would not extend Elliott v. Donahue, 169 Wis.2d 310, 485 N.W.2d 403 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9272 - 2017-09-19
State v. Debra F.
was extended annually. ¶4 On June 25, 2002, the State filed a petition seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7658 - 2005-03-31
was extended annually. ¶4 On June 25, 2002, the State filed a petition seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7658 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
years’ initial confinement and two years’ extended supervision for the battery, one year of initial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140058 - 2015-04-14
years’ initial confinement and two years’ extended supervision for the battery, one year of initial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140058 - 2015-04-14
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Rosemary S.A.
to “no,” on the grounds that an order extending Alchilseaya’s CHIPS disposition had not contained the statutorily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15828 - 2017-09-21
to “no,” on the grounds that an order extending Alchilseaya’s CHIPS disposition had not contained the statutorily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15828 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Subsequently, the circuit court sentenced Lane to two years’ initial confinement and two years’ extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140058 - 2017-09-21
. Subsequently, the circuit court sentenced Lane to two years’ initial confinement and two years’ extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140058 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Rosemary S.A.
to “no,” on the grounds that an order extending Alchilseaya’s CHIPS disposition had not contained the statutorily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15829 - 2017-09-21
to “no,” on the grounds that an order extending Alchilseaya’s CHIPS disposition had not contained the statutorily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15829 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
deadline of Rule 809.107(6)(e) is extended to the date of this decision, that is, February 20, 2013. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94713 - 2014-09-15
deadline of Rule 809.107(6)(e) is extended to the date of this decision, that is, February 20, 2013. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94713 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 22
)(a), the trial court is afforded three options when determining a defendant’s extended supervision eligibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34839 - 2014-09-15
)(a), the trial court is afforded three options when determining a defendant’s extended supervision eligibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34839 - 2014-09-15