Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6661 - 6670 of 9176 for op.

State v. Trammel V. Johnson
denied his claim in an unpublished opinion. See State v. Johnson, No. 02-0277, unpublished slip op. (Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5528 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Campbell, No. 2001AP2321-CR, unpublished slip op. (WI App Sept. 24, 2002). ¶3 In 2010, Campbell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88418 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
decision, Fiduciary Real Estate Development, Inc. v. Goodavage, No. 2010AP3056, unpublished slip op. (WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90207 - 2014-09-15

City of Oshkosh v. Christopher Mack
, Nos. 94-2157 and 94-2226, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct. App. Aug. 10, 1995), we imposed a monetary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11148 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
slip op. and order (WI App Apr. 6, 2016). 4 The motion to reconsider was filed on August 30, 2016
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220313 - 2018-10-02

[PDF] NOTICE
No. 1998CF811. See State v. Gaustad, No. 2007AP1429, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct. App. Feb. 14, 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52099 - 2014-09-15

Paul Ellsworth v. State of Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
of the drainage ditch. We agree and affirm the order for dismissal.” Majority op. at ¶1. ¶16 This statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6476 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Joseph Eckstein
unpublished slip op. (July 25, 2000). ¶10 Eckstein subsequently acquired new counsel and filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5713 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
-CR, unpublished slip op. (WI App Mar. 13, 2007). ¶4 In June 2008, Canady, pro se, filed a Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56323 - 2010-11-08

[PDF] Paul Ellsworth v. State of Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
of the drainage ditch. We agree and affirm the order for dismissal.” Majority op. at ¶1. ¶16 This statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6476 - 2017-09-19