Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6661 - 6670 of 64227 for records/1000.
Search results 6661 - 6670 of 64227 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the no-merit report and the record, we conclude that no arguably meritorious issues exist for an appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191960 - 2017-09-21
of the no-merit report and the record, we conclude that no arguably meritorious issues exist for an appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191960 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
was not to record voir dire proceedings unless it was specifically requested. Recording of voir dire did not become
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70478 - 2011-09-06
was not to record voir dire proceedings unless it was specifically requested. Recording of voir dire did not become
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70478 - 2011-09-06
[PDF]
Daniel Grossen v. Gary Grossen
to file a “petition” for reasonable fees and expenses. Nothing in the record, however, suggests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25783 - 2017-09-21
to file a “petition” for reasonable fees and expenses. Nothing in the record, however, suggests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25783 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not respond. This court has considered the no-merit report, and we have independently reviewed the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216149 - 2018-07-24
not respond. This court has considered the no-merit report, and we have independently reviewed the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216149 - 2018-07-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the record conclusively demonstrates that Packer was not entitled to withdraw his pleas. We therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256674 - 2020-03-17
the record conclusively demonstrates that Packer was not entitled to withdraw his pleas. We therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256674 - 2020-03-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no-merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131523 - 2017-09-21
no-merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131523 - 2017-09-21
State v. Derrick L. Madlock
. Madlock contends that a hearing was necessary because the record failed to sufficiently establish the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14528 - 2005-03-31
. Madlock contends that a hearing was necessary because the record failed to sufficiently establish the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14528 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
charges and that he is entitled to a new trial because the record fails to establish that the jury panel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122846 - 2014-10-01
charges and that he is entitled to a new trial because the record fails to establish that the jury panel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122846 - 2014-10-01
COURT OF APPEALS
acknowledged as much.[5] ¶14 Second, H & C contends Pember’s argument is unsupported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125491 - 2014-11-03
acknowledged as much.[5] ¶14 Second, H & C contends Pember’s argument is unsupported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125491 - 2014-11-03
COURT OF APPEALS
of the trial transcript in the appellate record, Walton forfeited her objection to the denial of her request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42800 - 2009-10-28
of the trial transcript in the appellate record, Walton forfeited her objection to the denial of her request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42800 - 2009-10-28