Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6671 - 6680 of 16854 for "48.44" +50.
Search results 6671 - 6680 of 16854 for "48.44" +50.
COURT OF APPEALS
confidence in the conviction.” State v. Williams, 2002 WI 58, ¶50, 253 Wis. 2d 99, 644 N.W.2d 919 (citations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85764 - 2012-08-07
confidence in the conviction.” State v. Williams, 2002 WI 58, ¶50, 253 Wis. 2d 99, 644 N.W.2d 919 (citations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85764 - 2012-08-07
State v. Daniel Anderson
.2d 670, 683, 360 N.W.2d 43, 50 (1985). The trial court should be mindful that any increase
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10226 - 2005-03-31
.2d 670, 683, 360 N.W.2d 43, 50 (1985). The trial court should be mindful that any increase
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10226 - 2005-03-31
State v. Roger M. Smejkal
the phone and stated that he or she just purchased the cell phone from Smejkal for $50. By 5 p.m., Smejkal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6600 - 2005-03-31
the phone and stated that he or she just purchased the cell phone from Smejkal for $50. By 5 p.m., Smejkal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6600 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, 184 Wis. 2d 324, 349-50, 516 N.W.2d 463 (Ct. App. 1994) (Anderson, P.J., concurring); see also State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36539 - 2014-09-15
, 184 Wis. 2d 324, 349-50, 516 N.W.2d 463 (Ct. App. 1994) (Anderson, P.J., concurring); see also State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36539 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to plead guilty or go to trial. See State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310-11, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120183 - 2014-09-15
to plead guilty or go to trial. See State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310-11, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120183 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James Gruentzel
precision. Id., ¶¶49-50. A trial court must provide an explanation for the general range
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6934 - 2017-09-20
precision. Id., ¶¶49-50. A trial court must provide an explanation for the general range
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6934 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
N.W.2d 50 (Ct. App. 1987). This is referred to as the “new issues test,” and it is to be liberally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708339 - 2023-10-03
N.W.2d 50 (Ct. App. 1987). This is referred to as the “new issues test,” and it is to be liberally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708339 - 2023-10-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
. 2d 99, ¶50. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55967 - 2014-09-15
. 2d 99, ¶50. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55967 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
County of Jefferson v. James I. Krause
. Williams, 2002 WI 58, ¶50, 253 Wis. 2d 99, 644 N.W.2d 919). When determining whether error is harmless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5479 - 2017-09-19
. Williams, 2002 WI 58, ¶50, 253 Wis. 2d 99, 644 N.W.2d 919). When determining whether error is harmless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5479 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert E. Koutnik, Jr.
Wis. 2d 303, 312, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). ¶12 An ineffective assistance of counsel claim is a mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4114 - 2005-03-31
Wis. 2d 303, 312, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). ¶12 An ineffective assistance of counsel claim is a mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4114 - 2005-03-31