Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6671 - 6680 of 12464 for mr.
Search results 6671 - 6680 of 12464 for mr.
COURT OF APPEALS
that guise. [COURT]: Well, Mr. Kopsi what was your intent? [KOPSI]: [T]he original plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35550 - 2009-02-17
that guise. [COURT]: Well, Mr. Kopsi what was your intent? [KOPSI]: [T]he original plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35550 - 2009-02-17
COURT OF APPEALS
to consider the boy’s emotionally fragile condition. The prosecutor argued: And while what Mr. Boyle said
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32195 - 2008-03-25
to consider the boy’s emotionally fragile condition. The prosecutor argued: And while what Mr. Boyle said
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32195 - 2008-03-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to [the court] whether it’s Mr. Bihler who tries it or Mr. Kovac … But justice delayed is justice denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255476 - 2020-03-03
to [the court] whether it’s Mr. Bihler who tries it or Mr. Kovac … But justice delayed is justice denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255476 - 2020-03-03
COURT OF APPEALS
the prosecutor “argued at great length numerous facts that related to the crimes Mr. Staples’ [sic] was found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28828 - 2007-06-26
the prosecutor “argued at great length numerous facts that related to the crimes Mr. Staples’ [sic] was found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28828 - 2007-06-26
COURT OF APPEALS
that she had obtained a restraining order against Mr. Sundermeyer. 3. Counsel failed to object when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36152 - 2009-04-13
that she had obtained a restraining order against Mr. Sundermeyer. 3. Counsel failed to object when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36152 - 2009-04-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with Mr. Mattioli’s criminal trial.” The court was concerned about the effects of the video footage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=602575 - 2023-01-10
with Mr. Mattioli’s criminal trial.” The court was concerned about the effects of the video footage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=602575 - 2023-01-10
[PDF]
City of Lake Mills v. Alton D. Behlke
that compounds could interfere with the functioning of the machine, Behlke’s counsel stated: Mr. Menart’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2679 - 2017-09-19
that compounds could interfere with the functioning of the machine, Behlke’s counsel stated: Mr. Menart’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2679 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
be supportive of Mr. Smith’s statements [the first prospective juror defense counsel removed]. I recall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47973 - 2015-04-14
be supportive of Mr. Smith’s statements [the first prospective juror defense counsel removed]. I recall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47973 - 2015-04-14
[PDF]
School Board of the Pardeeville Area School District v. Cynthia V. Bomber
conferences. Ms. Bomber’s undisputed affidavit reads: “Mr. Keenan [Ms. Bomber’s supervisor] represented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12506 - 2014-09-15
conferences. Ms. Bomber’s undisputed affidavit reads: “Mr. Keenan [Ms. Bomber’s supervisor] represented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12506 - 2014-09-15
State v. Daryl M. Knighten
on the bench given the structure of counsel tables that Mr. Knighten’s feet and legs and therefore the ankle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11401 - 2005-03-31
on the bench given the structure of counsel tables that Mr. Knighten’s feet and legs and therefore the ankle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11401 - 2005-03-31

