Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6671 - 6680 of 63537 for records.
Search results 6671 - 6680 of 63537 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242538 - 2019-06-19
the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242538 - 2019-06-19
State v. Kenyon H.
oral decision set out in the briefs, but not, for some reason not apparent from the record, included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5351 - 2005-03-31
oral decision set out in the briefs, but not, for some reason not apparent from the record, included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5351 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=734430 - 2023-11-30
of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=734430 - 2023-11-30
Linda Wilson-Otto v. James Otto
reviewed the record, we agree. We therefore reverse the property division component of the divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2147 - 2005-03-31
reviewed the record, we agree. We therefore reverse the property division component of the divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2147 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gregory L. Hoover
on the record: We then had a discussion about whether the jury would be allowed to go home or whether we’d keep
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2135 - 2005-03-31
on the record: We then had a discussion about whether the jury would be allowed to go home or whether we’d keep
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2135 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record and the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164099 - 2017-09-21
review of the record and the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164099 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the record, counsel’s reports, and Thornhill’s response, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120918 - 2014-09-15
reviewing the record, counsel’s reports, and Thornhill’s response, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120918 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at the hearing that would have [a]ffected the outcome” and because the trial court “did not note on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106275 - 2017-09-21
at the hearing that would have [a]ffected the outcome” and because the trial court “did not note on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106275 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
had decided to accept a plea offer from the State. The court conducted an on-the-record plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739677 - 2023-12-14
had decided to accept a plea offer from the State. The court conducted an on-the-record plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739677 - 2023-12-14
[PDF]
Racine County Department of Human Services v. Stormy W.
that her consent would be a final decision on her part, placing on the record its perceptions about her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4586 - 2017-09-19
that her consent would be a final decision on her part, placing on the record its perceptions about her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4586 - 2017-09-19