Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 66721 - 66730 of 83494 for case codes/1000.
Search results 66721 - 66730 of 83494 for case codes/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
the party who won the case the entirety of their fees when that party was only nominally successful at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54842 - 2010-10-04
the party who won the case the entirety of their fees when that party was only nominally successful at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54842 - 2010-10-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
was not decided at the time, he states the case was on appeal and his counsel therefore should have filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54715 - 2014-09-15
was not decided at the time, he states the case was on appeal and his counsel therefore should have filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54715 - 2014-09-15
State v. James W. Woller
. See id. How much explanation is required, however, depends on the nature of the case, but courts must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20253 - 2005-11-14
. See id. How much explanation is required, however, depends on the nature of the case, but courts must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20253 - 2005-11-14
State v. Todd R. Martin
its burden of establishing a prima facie case is a question of law that we decide de novo. Id. at 78
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20895 - 2006-01-10
its burden of establishing a prima facie case is a question of law that we decide de novo. Id. at 78
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20895 - 2006-01-10
[PDF]
Associated Bank v. Lawrence Pufall
to November 25, 1999. However, we do not address this argument. The appropriate remedy in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4864 - 2017-09-19
to November 25, 1999. However, we do not address this argument. The appropriate remedy in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4864 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Arden Krueger
2001 WI App 14 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-1136-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2542 - 2017-09-19
2001 WI App 14 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-1136-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2542 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on in the case, the victim sent a notarized letter to the district attorney’s office that “clearly explained
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145051 - 2017-09-21
on in the case, the victim sent a notarized letter to the district attorney’s office that “clearly explained
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145051 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the weapon, evidence to which trial counsel did not object. Piggee’s theory of the case was that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204733 - 2017-12-13
the weapon, evidence to which trial counsel did not object. Piggee’s theory of the case was that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204733 - 2017-12-13
[PDF]
State v. Argyle L. Hagen
, there is nothing in Swanson to indicate that the arrest in this case was illegal. First, the Swanson footnote
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16297 - 2017-09-21
, there is nothing in Swanson to indicate that the arrest in this case was illegal. First, the Swanson footnote
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16297 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Stephen J. Weissenberger v. Robert Kellberg
prevails in whole or in substantial part" in a mandamus action.3 Wisconsin case law interpreting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13968 - 2014-09-15
prevails in whole or in substantial part" in a mandamus action.3 Wisconsin case law interpreting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13968 - 2014-09-15