Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6681 - 6690 of 98518 for court records search online.
Search results 6681 - 6690 of 98518 for court records search online.
[PDF]
State v. Travis J. Smith
are in the appeal record … the present pro se appeal brings before the court both Smith’s conviction and the orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6189 - 2017-09-19
are in the appeal record … the present pro se appeal brings before the court both Smith’s conviction and the orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6189 - 2017-09-19
State v. Linda Lacey
Sand Road.” She also contends the search warrants were improper because a court commissioner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6991 - 2005-03-31
Sand Road.” She also contends the search warrants were improper because a court commissioner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6991 - 2005-03-31
State v. Linda Lacey
Sand Road.” She also contends the search warrants were improper because a court commissioner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6992 - 2005-03-31
Sand Road.” She also contends the search warrants were improper because a court commissioner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6992 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey Stout
2002 WI App 41 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-0904-CR 01-0905
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3803 - 2005-03-31
2002 WI App 41 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-0904-CR 01-0905
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3803 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey Stout
2002 WI App 41 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-0904-CR 01-0905
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3802 - 2005-03-31
2002 WI App 41 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-0904-CR 01-0905
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3802 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey Stout
to search his room. Id. In a footnote, we explicitly refused to sanction the trial court’s use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3803 - 2017-09-20
to search his room. Id. In a footnote, we explicitly refused to sanction the trial court’s use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3803 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey Stout
to search his room. Id. In a footnote, we explicitly refused to sanction the trial court’s use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3802 - 2017-09-20
to search his room. Id. In a footnote, we explicitly refused to sanction the trial court’s use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3802 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 17, 2008 David R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34875 - 2014-09-15
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 17, 2008 David R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34875 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Phillip T. Litzler
by exploitation of the contemporaneous illegal search.” The trial court stated that “[i]t's a matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8165 - 2017-09-19
by exploitation of the contemporaneous illegal search.” The trial court stated that “[i]t's a matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8165 - 2017-09-19
State v. Phillip T. Litzler
by exploitation of the contemporaneous illegal search.” The trial court stated that “[i
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8165 - 2005-03-31
by exploitation of the contemporaneous illegal search.” The trial court stated that “[i
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8165 - 2005-03-31