Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6681 - 6690 of 24568 for extending.

[PDF] State v. Peter C. Ramuta
confinement of five years, and two years of extended supervision. These sentences were consecutive to each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5296 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
deadline of Rule 809.107(6)(e) is extended to the date of this decision, that is, February 20, 2013. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94713 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
intersection with State Highway 140. The Town argues that the right-of- way was extended, not moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84491 - 2014-09-15

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Rosemary S.A.
, or alternatively, changing the answer to question 1 of that verdict to “no,” on the grounds that an order extending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15826 - 2005-03-31

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Rosemary S.A.
, or alternatively, changing the answer to question 1 of that verdict to “no,” on the grounds that an order extending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15827 - 2005-03-31

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Rosemary S.A.
, or alternatively, changing the answer to question 1 of that verdict to “no,” on the grounds that an order extending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15828 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
storage bin, her clothing got caught on an unshielded, rotating bolt that extended outward from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84419 - 2014-09-15

CA Blank Order
years’ initial confinement and two years’ extended supervision for the battery, one year of initial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140058 - 2015-04-14

COURT OF APPEALS
of extended supervision. Wilson elected to go to trial. The jury found him guilty, as a party to a crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121339 - 2014-09-15

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Rosemary S.A.
, or alternatively, changing the answer to question 1 of that verdict to “no,” on the grounds that an order extending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15829 - 2005-03-31