Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6681 - 6690 of 58618 for speedy trial.
Search results 6681 - 6690 of 58618 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
-disposition relief. For the reasons that follow, this court affirms the trial court’s orders.[4] BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82304 - 2012-05-07
-disposition relief. For the reasons that follow, this court affirms the trial court’s orders.[4] BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82304 - 2012-05-07
State v. Iran Shuttlesworth
appeals from a judgment of conviction entered following a jury trial for two counts of kidnapping
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16201 - 2005-03-31
appeals from a judgment of conviction entered following a jury trial for two counts of kidnapping
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16201 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
-disposition relief. For the reasons that follow, this court affirms the trial court’s orders.[4] BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80044 - 2012-05-06
-disposition relief. For the reasons that follow, this court affirms the trial court’s orders.[4] BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80044 - 2012-05-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). ¶1 PER CURIAM. Markeith J. Wilson appeals from a trial court judgment entered on jury verdicts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1074182 - 2026-02-11
). ¶1 PER CURIAM. Markeith J. Wilson appeals from a trial court judgment entered on jury verdicts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1074182 - 2026-02-11
State v. Derrick C. Montriel
) there was no factual basis to support his plea; (2) the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7289 - 2005-03-31
) there was no factual basis to support his plea; (2) the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7289 - 2005-03-31
Ronald A. Arthur v. William J. Keefe
& Leja Lumber.[3] We affirm the trial court’s dismissal of Arthur’s claims, but on grounds other than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14365 - 2005-03-31
& Leja Lumber.[3] We affirm the trial court’s dismissal of Arthur’s claims, but on grounds other than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14365 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dujuan T. Nash
. The motion was never litigated. Nash pled guilty to both charges and the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4392 - 2017-09-19
. The motion was never litigated. Nash pled guilty to both charges and the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4392 - 2017-09-19
State v. Dawn M. Brantmeier
Brantmeier for sex. ¶2 Brantmeier argues that she is entitled to a new trial on four bases: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2733 - 2005-03-31
Brantmeier for sex. ¶2 Brantmeier argues that she is entitled to a new trial on four bases: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2733 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ronald A. Arthur v. William J. Keefe
with the Keefes; and (3) dismissing his claims against Hanson & Leja Lumber. 3 We affirm the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14365 - 2014-09-15
with the Keefes; and (3) dismissing his claims against Hanson & Leja Lumber. 3 We affirm the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14365 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
by failing to allege his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance regarding the refusal to allow him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35646 - 2009-02-23
by failing to allege his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance regarding the refusal to allow him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35646 - 2009-02-23