Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 66851 - 66860 of 69045 for had.
Search results 66851 - 66860 of 69045 for had.
COURT OF APPEALS
that the reports would never have been generated in the first place if he had not requested occasional status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92477 - 2013-02-04
that the reports would never have been generated in the first place if he had not requested occasional status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92477 - 2013-02-04
John P. Zakowski for the State Department of Workforce Development ex rel Wayne M. Vanden v.
pay and actually had received one extra day of vacation pay. The court also found that the five days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7284 - 2005-03-31
pay and actually had received one extra day of vacation pay. The court also found that the five days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7284 - 2005-03-31
Viola G. Bodach v. Village of Fontana-On-Geneva Lake
refunds on excessive assessments. The taxpayers’ posttrial brief acknowledges that the Bodach group had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11480 - 2005-03-31
refunds on excessive assessments. The taxpayers’ posttrial brief acknowledges that the Bodach group had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11480 - 2005-03-31
State v. Cedric Brown, Sr.
that while the victim and Brown “were smoking weed, the defendant asked her, ‘Have you ever had a … dick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6627 - 2005-03-31
that while the victim and Brown “were smoking weed, the defendant asked her, ‘Have you ever had a … dick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6627 - 2005-03-31
Ruth M. Erickson v. Alvin Zimmerman
and held: that the general asset assignment was executed after the annuity had been in place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13872 - 2005-03-31
and held: that the general asset assignment was executed after the annuity had been in place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13872 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and with the same effect as if the appeal had been originally properly taken. Sieverding contends that the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208750 - 2018-02-22
, and with the same effect as if the appeal had been originally properly taken. Sieverding contends that the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208750 - 2018-02-22
[PDF]
State v. Eric J. Yelk
that he “ha[d] enough time to discuss these matters with [his trial counsel],” and that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11853 - 2017-09-21
that he “ha[d] enough time to discuss these matters with [his trial counsel],” and that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11853 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the ninety-day statutory limit had expired where there was “good reason for the delay”). While Earsley
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237982 - 2019-03-21
the ninety-day statutory limit had expired where there was “good reason for the delay”). While Earsley
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237982 - 2019-03-21
[PDF]
Brown County v. Rock County
the case in the manner it did had Brown County participated in the hearing, we consider a remand for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9618 - 2017-09-19
the case in the manner it did had Brown County participated in the hearing, we consider a remand for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9618 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Eric J. Yelk
that he “ha[d] enough time to discuss these matters with [his trial counsel],” and that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11855 - 2017-09-21
that he “ha[d] enough time to discuss these matters with [his trial counsel],” and that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11855 - 2017-09-21