Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 66891 - 66900 of 83486 for case codes/1000.
Search results 66891 - 66900 of 83486 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
During voir dire, only a handful of potential jurors said they had heard about the case in the media
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812118 - 2024-06-11
During voir dire, only a handful of potential jurors said they had heard about the case in the media
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812118 - 2024-06-11
State v. Eric J. Yelk
panel. Although the trial court did not consolidate these cases, it considered the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11852 - 2005-03-31
panel. Although the trial court did not consolidate these cases, it considered the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11852 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and circumstances of the case.” Id., ¶20 (footnote omitted). “[A] prior no merit appeal may serve as a procedural
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29964 - 2007-08-13
and circumstances of the case.” Id., ¶20 (footnote omitted). “[A] prior no merit appeal may serve as a procedural
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29964 - 2007-08-13
State v. Victoria D. Roesing
station, Roesing refused to submit to a blood test. ¶4 The case was tried to a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3305 - 2005-03-31
station, Roesing refused to submit to a blood test. ¶4 The case was tried to a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3305 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the party who won the case the entirety of their fees when that party was only nominally successful at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54842 - 2010-10-04
the party who won the case the entirety of their fees when that party was only nominally successful at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54842 - 2010-10-04
State v. Juan Jesus S.
the “elements-only” test to the offenses involved in this case, we conclude that possession of a switchblade
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14480 - 2005-03-31
the “elements-only” test to the offenses involved in this case, we conclude that possession of a switchblade
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14480 - 2005-03-31
State v. Karen A. Salm
facts in this case are undisputed. Salm did not testify at her implied consent refusal hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4373 - 2005-03-31
facts in this case are undisputed. Salm did not testify at her implied consent refusal hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4373 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
was not decided at the time, he states the case was on appeal and his counsel therefore should have filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54715 - 2014-09-15
was not decided at the time, he states the case was on appeal and his counsel therefore should have filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54715 - 2014-09-15
State v. James W. Woller
. See id. How much explanation is required, however, depends on the nature of the case, but courts must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20253 - 2005-11-14
. See id. How much explanation is required, however, depends on the nature of the case, but courts must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20253 - 2005-11-14
State v. Todd R. Martin
its burden of establishing a prima facie case is a question of law that we decide de novo. Id. at 78
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20895 - 2006-01-10
its burden of establishing a prima facie case is a question of law that we decide de novo. Id. at 78
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20895 - 2006-01-10