Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6691 - 6700 of 16854 for "48.44" +50.

State v. Thomas F. W.
exercise of discretion standard. Peters v. State, 50 Wis. 2d 682, 687, 184 N.W.2d 826, 829 (1971). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3292 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to see and remove the images in the closet.4 See State v. Carroll, 2010 WI 8, ¶50, 322 Wis. 2d 299
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240694 - 2019-05-14

[PDF] County of Milwaukee v. John P. Baumgartner
. at 749-50. This power ensures a court the authority to control its docket, including: (1) disposing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4469 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Appeal No. 2006AP2388-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2005CF681
observes that the person driving the vehicle is a 50- or 60-year-old woman, any reasonable suspicion
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29909 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
809.23(1)(b)5. AppealNo AddtlCap Panel2 2014-09-15T18:16:50-0500 CCAP
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55725 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Roger M. Smejkal
for $50. By 5 p.m., Smejkal had not returned. ¶4 At approximately 5:30 a.m. the next day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6600 - 2017-09-19

State v. Romel D.
, 701, 499 N.W.2d 152, 161 (1993) (quoting State v. Paszek, 50 Wis.2d 619, 624‑25, 184 N.W.2d 836, 839
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15775 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
and would have insisted on going to trial.” State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 312, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46617 - 2010-02-09

COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 123 (Ct. App. 1997) (where partner with 50% interest did not have authority to individually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45974 - 2010-01-19

COURT OF APPEALS
would lead a reasonable officer to believe that guilt is more than a possibility. State v. Paszek, 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41618 - 2009-09-30