Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6691 - 6700 of 69971 for as he.
Search results 6691 - 6700 of 69971 for as he.
[PDF]
State v. Patrick A. Saunders
requires Saunders to allege substantial issues of fact as to events in which he participated before his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8053 - 2017-09-19
requires Saunders to allege substantial issues of fact as to events in which he participated before his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8053 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and ordered that he serve the sentence consecutively to any sentence previously imposed. The circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107891 - 2017-09-21
and ordered that he serve the sentence consecutively to any sentence previously imposed. The circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107891 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
court’s No. 2009AP324-CR 2 conclusion that he did is supported by its factual findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47247 - 2014-09-15
court’s No. 2009AP324-CR 2 conclusion that he did is supported by its factual findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47247 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that he should have been allowed to withdraw his guilty plea on grounds that the court did not explain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139720 - 2015-04-14
that he should have been allowed to withdraw his guilty plea on grounds that the court did not explain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139720 - 2015-04-14
State v. Willie J. Wroten
postconviction motion to withdraw his no contest pleas. He argues that the circuit court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3390 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion to withdraw his no contest pleas. He argues that the circuit court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3390 - 2005-03-31
State v. Andrew J. Biller
. First, he contends that his trial counsel was ineffective, and that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8759 - 2005-03-31
. First, he contends that his trial counsel was ineffective, and that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8759 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, 939.32 (2001–02).1 He appeals pro se from the order denying his second WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2005–06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29782 - 2014-09-15
, 939.32 (2001–02).1 He appeals pro se from the order denying his second WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2005–06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29782 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the no-merit reports but he did not respond. Upon consideration of the no-merit reports and an independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858751 - 2024-10-08
of the no-merit reports but he did not respond. Upon consideration of the no-merit reports and an independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858751 - 2024-10-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
grabbed a gun and went outside. ¶3 According to Montgomery’s statement to police, when he got outside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39849 - 2014-09-15
grabbed a gun and went outside. ¶3 According to Montgomery’s statement to police, when he got outside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39849 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael E. Learmont
restraining order as a repeat offender. He argues that the sentencing court violated his due process rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14673 - 2017-09-21
restraining order as a repeat offender. He argues that the sentencing court violated his due process rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14673 - 2017-09-21