Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6691 - 6700 of 51987 for legal separation.
Search results 6691 - 6700 of 51987 for legal separation.
[PDF]
Arshel G. Ruperd v. Sharon L. Ruperd
of the parties’ house as of the time they separated, and that the court erred when it did not award her any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4358 - 2017-09-19
of the parties’ house as of the time they separated, and that the court erred when it did not award her any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4358 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court imposed the $250 DNA surcharge for the felonies in the two separate cases underlying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157954 - 2017-09-21
court imposed the $250 DNA surcharge for the felonies in the two separate cases underlying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157954 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 1 By separate appeal, Spencer has also appealed the judgment of foreclosure. Today we release
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168384 - 2017-09-21
. 1 By separate appeal, Spencer has also appealed the judgment of foreclosure. Today we release
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168384 - 2017-09-21
Eddie D. Cannon v. State
, which is the subject of a still pending separate replevin action. Therefore, the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8639 - 2005-03-31
, which is the subject of a still pending separate replevin action. Therefore, the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8639 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 255
. Because they were both under the legal drinking age of twenty-one, they were unable to purchase alcohol
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27154 - 2014-09-15
. Because they were both under the legal drinking age of twenty-one, they were unable to purchase alcohol
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27154 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Brief of Amicus Curiae (BLOC)
Christopher Lamar CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER 1101 14th St. NW Suite 400 Washington, DC 20005 mgaber
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/briefamicuscuriaebloc.pdf - 2021-10-18
Christopher Lamar CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER 1101 14th St. NW Suite 400 Washington, DC 20005 mgaber
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/briefamicuscuriaebloc.pdf - 2021-10-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
facts, applied a proper legal standard, and, using a demonstrated rational process, reached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83171 - 2014-09-15
facts, applied a proper legal standard, and, using a demonstrated rational process, reached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83171 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
court examined the relevant facts, applied a proper legal standard, and, using a demonstrated rational
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83171 - 2012-05-30
court examined the relevant facts, applied a proper legal standard, and, using a demonstrated rational
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83171 - 2012-05-30
Certification
provisions at issue here have direct counterparts in a separate statutory subchapter that applies to state
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96058 - 2013-04-24
provisions at issue here have direct counterparts in a separate statutory subchapter that applies to state
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96058 - 2013-04-24
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2012AP2067 Cir. Ct. No. 2011CV3774
employees, but the statutory provisions at issue here have direct counterparts in a separate statutory
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96058 - 2014-09-15
employees, but the statutory provisions at issue here have direct counterparts in a separate statutory
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96058 - 2014-09-15