Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6691 - 6700 of 63537 for records.
Search results 6691 - 6700 of 63537 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=734430 - 2023-11-30
of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=734430 - 2023-11-30
COURT OF APPEALS
[a]ffected the outcome” and because the trial court “did not note on the record [its] reasoning” for ordering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106275 - 2014-01-06
[a]ffected the outcome” and because the trial court “did not note on the record [its] reasoning” for ordering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106275 - 2014-01-06
State v. Bryan Lee Hudson
and of his own free will. There is nothing in the record to convince us that the trial court's findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9831 - 2005-03-31
and of his own free will. There is nothing in the record to convince us that the trial court's findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9831 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
resulting from the plea; (2) whether an adequate record has been developed on which to decide issues raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62279 - 2011-04-04
resulting from the plea; (2) whether an adequate record has been developed on which to decide issues raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62279 - 2011-04-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the summary judgment record provided a basis to conclude that the Wasserburgers had notice or knowledge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80524 - 2014-09-15
in the summary judgment record provided a basis to conclude that the Wasserburgers had notice or knowledge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80524 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that neither claim was supported by the record, and this appeal followed. DISCUSSION ¶5 Sentencing lies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65051 - 2014-09-15
that neither claim was supported by the record, and this appeal followed. DISCUSSION ¶5 Sentencing lies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65051 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
response, and this court has independently reviewed the record. This court agrees with appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266829 - 2020-07-07
response, and this court has independently reviewed the record. This court agrees with appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266829 - 2020-07-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242826 - 2019-06-26
, and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242826 - 2019-06-26
[PDF]
State v. Dontae L. Doyle
, and the fleeing count; (2) when he advised Doyle not to testify; (3) when he failed to subpoena time records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4884 - 2017-09-19
, and the fleeing count; (2) when he advised Doyle not to testify; (3) when he failed to subpoena time records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4884 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jason L. S.
, because this court concludes that the record contains sufficient evidence to support the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8716 - 2017-09-19
, because this court concludes that the record contains sufficient evidence to support the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8716 - 2017-09-19