Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 66951 - 66960 of 75011 for public records.
Search results 66951 - 66960 of 75011 for public records.
Donald Brzezinski v. Waukesha County
had not prejudiced the County. The record contains no inferences showing no prejudice. In sum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9846 - 2005-03-31
had not prejudiced the County. The record contains no inferences showing no prejudice. In sum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9846 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard L. Borowitz
. The affidavit further stated: [B]ased on … [Koehmstedt’s] training, experience, review of the records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3686 - 2005-03-31
. The affidavit further stated: [B]ased on … [Koehmstedt’s] training, experience, review of the records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3686 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Gary Reissner v. City of Prescott
were adversaries in the litigation. Although there is some indication in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7406 - 2017-09-20
were adversaries in the litigation. Although there is some indication in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7406 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based on our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=850953 - 2024-09-18
. Based on our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=850953 - 2024-09-18
[PDF]
Court of Appeals Statistics April 2025
in the form of a court order after the court has reviewed the briefs and the record and, generally
/ca/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=954917 - 2025-05-08
in the form of a court order after the court has reviewed the briefs and the record and, generally
/ca/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=954917 - 2025-05-08
State v. Michael A. White
(Ct. App. 1991). A court properly exercises discretion when it considers the facts of record under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5778 - 2005-03-31
(Ct. App. 1991). A court properly exercises discretion when it considers the facts of record under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5778 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
were unsupported by the record. We therefore affirm. By the Court.—Order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116325 - 2014-07-08
were unsupported by the record. We therefore affirm. By the Court.—Order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116325 - 2014-07-08
[PDF]
Court of Appeals Statistics June 2024
in the form of a court order after the court has reviewed the briefs and the record and, generally
/ca/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=824121 - 2024-07-08
in the form of a court order after the court has reviewed the briefs and the record and, generally
/ca/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=824121 - 2024-07-08
[PDF]
Court of Appeals Statistics February 2025
in the form of a court order after the court has reviewed the briefs and the record and, generally
/ca/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926455 - 2025-03-10
in the form of a court order after the court has reviewed the briefs and the record and, generally
/ca/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926455 - 2025-03-10
State v. Norman O. Brown
understood what the prosecutor said at the plea hearing and did not object. On this record, we are satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16050 - 2005-03-31
understood what the prosecutor said at the plea hearing and did not object. On this record, we are satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16050 - 2005-03-31