Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 66961 - 66970 of 69149 for had.
Search results 66961 - 66970 of 69149 for had.
State v. Daniel Marcellus Johnson
not breach the plea agreement, defense counsel had no duty to object. Accordingly, defense counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11940 - 2005-03-31
not breach the plea agreement, defense counsel had no duty to object. Accordingly, defense counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11940 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jeffrey L. Sprewell v. Gary R. McCaughtry
deputy sheriff who had apparently fallen in love with the inmate and agreed to help him escape. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14073 - 2014-09-15
deputy sheriff who had apparently fallen in love with the inmate and agreed to help him escape. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14073 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 43
. Had the circuit court done so, she contends, it would have recognized her as a prevailing party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78914 - 2014-09-15
. Had the circuit court done so, she contends, it would have recognized her as a prevailing party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78914 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Robert P. Stupar v. Township of Presque Isle
summary judgment against their claim because no party had moved for summary judgment on the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9213 - 2017-09-19
summary judgment against their claim because no party had moved for summary judgment on the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9213 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conclusions, that Brown had committed an ordinance violation instead of a misdemeanor, and that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868545 - 2024-10-29
conclusions, that Brown had committed an ordinance violation instead of a misdemeanor, and that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868545 - 2024-10-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to believe that the court had input into her “implied consent decision,” which resulted in her refusing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=796370 - 2024-05-02
to believe that the court had input into her “implied consent decision,” which resulted in her refusing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=796370 - 2024-05-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from the other counts. Thus, when the prosecutor pointed out the court had declared Count One
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132254 - 2017-09-21
from the other counts. Thus, when the prosecutor pointed out the court had declared Count One
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132254 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
property owners, and that Davis and Heeg had an ongoing dispute about Heeg’s use of a driveway crossing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29171 - 2014-09-15
property owners, and that Davis and Heeg had an ongoing dispute about Heeg’s use of a driveway crossing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29171 - 2014-09-15
Cynthia Hoffman v. Economy Preferred Insurance Company
she had permission to use the truck from the truck’s owners and its named insureds, Bruce and Pamela
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15288 - 2005-03-31
she had permission to use the truck from the truck’s owners and its named insureds, Bruce and Pamela
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15288 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Thiry had already paid $3,850.00 to the county in monthly installments, pursuant to the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149553 - 2017-09-21
that Thiry had already paid $3,850.00 to the county in monthly installments, pursuant to the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149553 - 2017-09-21