Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 66971 - 66980 of 75027 for public records.
Search results 66971 - 66980 of 75027 for public records.
COURT OF APPEALS
‘in accordance with accepted legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record.’” State v. Jenkins, 168
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68085 - 2011-07-19
‘in accordance with accepted legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record.’” State v. Jenkins, 168
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68085 - 2011-07-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132113 - 2017-09-21
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132113 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
James R. Koby v. La Crosse County Circuit Court
of intoxication was an odor of intoxicants on the defendant’s breath and the record does not reveal whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4966 - 2017-09-19
of intoxication was an odor of intoxicants on the defendant’s breath and the record does not reveal whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4966 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Court of Appeals Statistics August 2025
in the form of a court order after the court has reviewed the briefs and the record and, generally
/ca/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011139 - 2025-09-15
in the form of a court order after the court has reviewed the briefs and the record and, generally
/ca/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011139 - 2025-09-15
CA Blank Order
contends that he was denied equal protection under the law. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92837 - 2013-02-19
contends that he was denied equal protection under the law. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92837 - 2013-02-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Perez Jimenez has not filed a responsive brief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059113 - 2026-01-05
Perez Jimenez has not filed a responsive brief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059113 - 2026-01-05
[PDF]
Annette B. Brudnowski v. John M. Brudnowski
were fully aware of the disputed issue raised on Bichler’s behalf. The facts of record support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11971 - 2017-09-21
were fully aware of the disputed issue raised on Bichler’s behalf. The facts of record support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11971 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118590 - 2014-07-28
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118590 - 2014-07-28
[PDF]
CA Clerk-Ltr
issued in the form of a court order after the court has reviewed the briefs and the record
/ca/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=620543 - 2023-02-07
issued in the form of a court order after the court has reviewed the briefs and the record
/ca/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=620543 - 2023-02-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
not have a key that opened the van’s door, and that the cell phone would have provided a record of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28488 - 2014-09-15
not have a key that opened the van’s door, and that the cell phone would have provided a record of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28488 - 2014-09-15