Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 66981 - 66990 of 68579 for law.
Search results 66981 - 66990 of 68579 for law.
COURT OF APPEALS
at 553. A. Investigative Stop. ¶12 Law enforcement officers may temporarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30148 - 2007-09-04
at 553. A. Investigative Stop. ¶12 Law enforcement officers may temporarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30148 - 2007-09-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Interpretation and application of a statute are questions of law that we review independently. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113104 - 2017-09-21
. Interpretation and application of a statute are questions of law that we review independently. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113104 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Dennis L. Steele
, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could disagree on the proper facts or the inferences to be drawn from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13267 - 2017-09-21
, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could disagree on the proper facts or the inferences to be drawn from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13267 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
as long as the court “‘examined the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law, and, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30794 - 2007-11-06
as long as the court “‘examined the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law, and, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30794 - 2007-11-06
Rock County Department of Human Services v. Yolanda M.
of the doubt. We start with the presumption that a judge knows and correctly applies the law. See Arave v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5953 - 2005-03-31
of the doubt. We start with the presumption that a judge knows and correctly applies the law. See Arave v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5953 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph L. Compton
“clear and unequivocal” guidelines to the law enforcement profession. Surely there is nothing ambiguous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7087 - 2005-03-31
“clear and unequivocal” guidelines to the law enforcement profession. Surely there is nothing ambiguous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7087 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
if the [trial] court has examined the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law, and, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33624 - 2008-08-04
if the [trial] court has examined the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law, and, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33624 - 2008-08-04
State v. Roger P. Barber
of separate charges for trial was proper is a question of law that we review without deference to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13447 - 2005-03-31
of separate charges for trial was proper is a question of law that we review without deference to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13447 - 2005-03-31
State v. Roger P. Barber
of separate charges for trial was proper is a question of law that we review without deference to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13448 - 2005-03-31
of separate charges for trial was proper is a question of law that we review without deference to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13448 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
questions of law subject to our independent review. See WIREdata, Inc. v. Village of Sussex, 2008 WI 69
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46868 - 2010-02-08
questions of law subject to our independent review. See WIREdata, Inc. v. Village of Sussex, 2008 WI 69
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46868 - 2010-02-08