Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 671 - 680 of 6293 for 208.

COURT OF APPEALS
result would be reached” with the new evidence. See State v. McCallum, 208 Wis. 2d 463, 473, 561 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32389 - 2008-04-07

Jennifer Boucher v. North Memorial Medical Center
. City of Milwaukee, 208 Wis.2d 18, 25, 559 N.W.2d 563, 566 (1997). If the plain language of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14051 - 2005-03-31

City of Green Bay v. Donald J. Schleis
and ordinances are the same.” Tesker v. Town of Saukville, 208 Wis. 2d 600, 605, 561 N.W.2d 338 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16135 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
court’s clear dictates regarding the use of accomplice testimony. See Cook v. Cook, 208 Wis. 2d 166
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196687 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Reginald C. Bruskewitz v. Tellurian, Inc.
to the circuit court’s determination. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis.2d 361, 364-65, 560 N.W.2d 315, 317 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14447 - 2017-09-21

State v. Donald Mentzel
withdrawal motion.” More recently, in State v. Thompson, 208 Wis.2d 253, 257-58, 559 N.W.2d 917, 918 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12661 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. McCallum, 208 Wis. 2d 463, 473, 561 N.W.2d 707 (1997). “The withdrawal of a plea under the manifest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023107 - 2025-10-14

[PDF] State v. Deborah J. Zimmerman
. Martin, 208 Wis. 2d 361, 364-65, 560 N.W.2d 315 (Ct. App. 1997). ¶5 To be guilty of escape, Zimmerman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3301 - 2017-09-19

Courtyard Condominium Association, Inc. v. Barbara Draper
de novo. See Little Sissabagama Lake Shore Owners Ass’n, Inc. v. Town of Edgewater, 208 Wis. 2d 259
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2771 - 2005-03-31

State v. Deborah J. Zimmerman
. § 946.42(1)(a). We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3301 - 2005-03-31