Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 671 - 680 of 6963 for a u.
Search results 671 - 680 of 6963 for a u.
County of Bayfield v. Michael Emil Sulla
additional seconds after Sulla stopped behind him. Leaf testified he believed Cadotte planned to make a U
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19243 - 2005-08-08
additional seconds after Sulla stopped behind him. Leaf testified he believed Cadotte planned to make a U
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19243 - 2005-08-08
[PDF]
State v. Trentt O. Kinison
, 314 N.W.2d 911 (Ct. App. 1981), where we held that “[u]nder Wisconsin case law, breathalyzer tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7454 - 2017-09-20
, 314 N.W.2d 911 (Ct. App. 1981), where we held that “[u]nder Wisconsin case law, breathalyzer tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7454 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(1992) (“[U]pon collateral attack a judgment carries with it a presumption of regularity.”). Adams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191001 - 2017-09-21
(1992) (“[U]pon collateral attack a judgment carries with it a presumption of regularity.”). Adams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191001 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jimmie L. Perkins
noticed a van without a rear license plate, and made a u‑turn in order to stop the vehicle. While doing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7280 - 2005-03-31
noticed a van without a rear license plate, and made a u‑turn in order to stop the vehicle. While doing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7280 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that, at approximately 2:30 a.m., he observed Beckwith making an illegal U-turn and stopped Beckwith’s vehicle. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31751 - 2008-02-06
that, at approximately 2:30 a.m., he observed Beckwith making an illegal U-turn and stopped Beckwith’s vehicle. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31751 - 2008-02-06
[PDF]
State v. Trentt O. Kinison
, 314 N.W.2d 911 (Ct. App. 1981), where we held that “[u]nder Wisconsin case law, breathalyzer tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7453 - 2017-09-20
, 314 N.W.2d 911 (Ct. App. 1981), where we held that “[u]nder Wisconsin case law, breathalyzer tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7453 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
. § 30.19(1g)(c), which was the subject of a separate action.3 Under that statute, “[u]nless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35622 - 2014-09-15
. § 30.19(1g)(c), which was the subject of a separate action.3 Under that statute, “[u]nless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35622 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Casey J. Shelton
WISCONSIN STAT. § 346.63(1)(a) prohibits driving “[u]nder the influence of an intoxicant … to a degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3930 - 2017-09-20
WISCONSIN STAT. § 346.63(1)(a) prohibits driving “[u]nder the influence of an intoxicant … to a degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3930 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is dismissed.” Wichita Falls’ counsel confirmed that he “[u]nderstood” the court’s order. On April 5, 2017
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211733 - 2018-04-25
is dismissed.” Wichita Falls’ counsel confirmed that he “[u]nderstood” the court’s order. On April 5, 2017
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211733 - 2018-04-25
State v. Michelle A.H.
of “‘[u]nfair prejudice results when the proffered evidence has a tendency to influence the outcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5920 - 2005-03-31
of “‘[u]nfair prejudice results when the proffered evidence has a tendency to influence the outcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5920 - 2005-03-31