Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 671 - 680 of 839 for holt.

Helena Coke, M.D. v. Eau Claire Women's Care Service Corporation
is reached for the wrong reason. State v. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d 110, 124, 382 N.W.2d 679 (Ct. App. 1985). [6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7457 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of whether that argument was raised in the lower court. State v. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d 110, 124-25, 382 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=710629 - 2023-10-03

[PDF] State v. Chester B. Woods
by the evidence is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Holt, 128 Wis.2d 110, 126-27, 382 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14319 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Gregory T. Isermann v. MBL Life Assurance Corporation
that the doctrine of comity leads us to the same result reached by the circuit court. See State v. Holt, 128 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14577 - 2017-09-21

Gregory T. Isermann v. MBL Life Assurance Corporation
by the circuit court. See State v. Holt, 128 Wis.2d 110, 125, 382 N.W.2d 679, 687 (Ct. App. 1985) (we may affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14577 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 252
against a respondent who is seeking to uphold a trial court ruling. See State v. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d 110
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30375 - 2014-09-15

Paige K.B. v. Louis J. Molepske
in judicial proceedings shielded by absolute immunity); Bromund v. Holt, 24 Wis. 2d 336, 346, 129 N.W.2d 149
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17154 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Sonniel R. Gidarisingh
to a correct result. See State v. Holt, 128 Wis.2d 110, 124, 382 N.W.2d 679, 687 (Ct. App. 1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14165 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Chaunte Ott
affirm. See State v. Holt, 128 Wis.2d 110, 124, 382 N.W.2d 679, 687 (Ct. App. 1985). No. 97-0579
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12141 - 2017-09-21

2008 WI APP 54
on summary judgment is de novo. Moreover, we may affirm the circuit court for any reason. See State v. Holt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32124 - 2008-04-29