Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 671 - 680 of 839 for holt.

[PDF] Paige K.B. v. Louis J. Molepske
by absolute immunity); Bromund v. Holt, 24 Wis. 2d 336, 346, 129 N.W.2d 149 (1964)(finding appointed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17154 - 2017-09-21

Paige K.B. v. Louis J. Molepske
in judicial proceedings shielded by absolute immunity); Bromund v. Holt, 24 Wis. 2d 336, 346, 129 N.W.2d 149
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17154 - 2005-03-31

Gregory T. Isermann v. MBL Life Assurance Corporation
by the circuit court. See State v. Holt, 128 Wis.2d 110, 125, 382 N.W.2d 679, 687 (Ct. App. 1985) (we may affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14577 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 252
against a respondent who is seeking to uphold a trial court ruling. See State v. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d 110
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30375 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Sonniel R. Gidarisingh
to a correct result. See State v. Holt, 128 Wis.2d 110, 124, 382 N.W.2d 679, 687 (Ct. App. 1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14165 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Chester B. Woods
by the evidence is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Holt, 128 Wis.2d 110, 126-27, 382 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14319 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Chaunte Ott
affirm. See State v. Holt, 128 Wis.2d 110, 124, 382 N.W.2d 679, 687 (Ct. App. 1985). No. 97-0579
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12141 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
raised. See State v. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d 110, 124-25, 382 N.W.2d 679 (Ct. App. 1985). [6] If nothing else
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31634 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
not be obtained through actual or implied duress or coercion. Holt v. State, 17 Wis. 2d 468, 477, 117 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808733 - 2024-06-05

2008 WI APP 54
on summary judgment is de novo. Moreover, we may affirm the circuit court for any reason. See State v. Holt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32124 - 2008-04-29